Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32585933›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer.

PeiYu Hou, ChenHsi Hsieh, MingChow Wei, ShengMou Hsiao, PeiWei Shueng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07698795 (Impact of Vaginal Dilator Use on Vaginal Morbidity and Quality of Life Following Definitive Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07698795 completednot on this map

Impact of Vaginal Dilator Use on Vaginal Morbidity and Quality of Life Following Definitive Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer.

TypeobservationalSponsorChulabhorn Cancer CenterRan2020 to 2022Enrolled67ConditionsCervical Cancer Radiation Complications, QoL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bioinformatics Analysis RevealsComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

PeiYu HouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-6414
ChenHsi HsiehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-4695
MingChow WeiDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.
ShengMou HsiaoDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4381-9564
PeiWei ShuengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 2007 and 2016, and divided them into two age groups: age < 70 vs. age ≥ 70. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two age groups. The median follow-up was 32.2 months. A total of 123 patients were eligible, 83 patients in group 1 (age < 70), and 40 patients in group 2 (age ≥ 70). Patients in group 2 received less intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) application, less total RT dose, and less concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and tended to have more limited external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) volume. The treatment outcomes between the age groups revealed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), but no differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), 66.2% vs. 64.5%, and other loco-regional control. In multivariate analyses for all patients, the performance status, pathology with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and ICRT application were prognostic factors of CSS. The elderly patients with cervical cancer had comparable CSS and loco-regional control rates, despite receiving less comprehensive treatment. Conservative treatment strategies with RT alone could be appropriate for patients aged ≥ 70 y/o, especially for those with favorable stages or histopathology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrachytherapyChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTaiwanTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical Neoplasmscervical cancerelderlyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32585933
PMCPMC7345764
OpenAlexW3035833100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.