Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32585911›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Extracellular Vesicles from Skeletal Muscle Cells Efficiently Promote Myogenesis in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Denisa Baci, Maila Chirivì, Valentina Pace, Fabio Maiullari, Marika Milan, Andrea Rampin, Paolo Somma, Dario Presutti, Silvia Garavelli, Antonino Bruno and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Classes of Stem Cells: From Biology to Engineering.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Tissue-Engineered Skeletal Muscles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Current Strategies for the Regeneration of Skeletal Muscle Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Denisa BaciInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council, 00015 Rome, Italy.
Maila ChirivìInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council, 00015 Rome, Italy.
Valentina PaceInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council, 00015 Rome, Italy.
Fabio MaiullariGemelli Molise Hospital, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Marika MilanInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council, 00015 Rome, Italy.
Andrea RampinInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council, 00015 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4682-123X
Paolo SommaFlow Cytometry Core, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Dario PresuttiInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council, 00015 Rome, Italy.
Silvia GaravelliInstitute for Endocrinology and Oncology "Gaetano Salvatore", National Research Council, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonino BrunoIRCCS MultiMedica, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4790-0861
Stefano CannataDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Chiara LanzuoloInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, 20090 Milan, Italy.
Cesare GargioliDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-3969
Roberto RizziInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, 20090 Milan, Italy.
Claudia BearziInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council, 00015 Rome, Italy.
National Research Council · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITHumanitas University · ITInstitute for Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology · ITMultiMedica · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent advances, offered by cell therapy in the regenerative medicine field, offer a revolutionary potential for the development of innovative cures to restore compromised physiological functions or organs. Adult myogenic precursors, such as myoblasts or satellite cells, possess a marked regenerative capacity, but the exploitation of this potential still encounters significant challenges in clinical application, due to low rate of proliferation in vitro, as well as a reduced self-renewal capacity. In this scenario, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can offer not only an inexhaustible source of cells for regenerative therapeutic approaches, but also a valuable alternative for in vitro modeling of patient-specific diseases. In this study we established a reliable protocol to induce the myogenic differentiation of iPSCs, generated from pericytes and fibroblasts, exploiting skeletal muscle-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), in combination with chemically defined factors. This genetic integration-free approach generates functional skeletal myotubes maintaining the engraftment ability in vivo. Our results demonstrate evidence that EVs can act as biological "shuttles" to deliver specific bioactive molecules for a successful transgene-free differentiation offering new opportunities for disease modeling and regenerative approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsCell DifferentiationExtracellular VesiclesHealthy VolunteersHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMiceMuscle DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adultextracellular vesiclesiPSCpericytesskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID32585911
PMCPMC7349204
OpenAlexW3036502321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.