Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32585906›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle for Food Waste: A Second Life for Fresh-Cut Leafy Salad Crops in Animal Diets.

Luciano Pinotti, Michele Manoni, Francesca Fumagalli, Nicoletta Rovere, Alice Luciano, Matteo Ottoboni, Luca Ferrari, Federica Cheli, Olivera Djuragic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Impact ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of the Inclusion of Dietary Bitter Gourd (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Soybean Molasses in Animal Nutrition.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luciano PinottiDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0337-9426
Michele ManoniDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9785-4031
Francesca FumagalliDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.
Nicoletta RovereDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.
Alice LucianoDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.
Matteo OttoboniDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0123-3888
Luca FerrariDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.
Federica CheliDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, VESPA, University of Milan, 20134 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2682-8685
Olivera DjuragicInstitute of Food Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar cara Lazara, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

Fondazione Cariplo SUSFEEDMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale SAN Sustainable animal nutrition
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world's population is growing rapidly, which means that the environmental impact of food production needs to be reduced and that food should be considered as something precious and not wasted. Moreover, an urgent challenge facing the planet is the competition between the food produced for humans and the feed for animals. There are various solutions such as the use of plant/vegetable by-products (PBPs) and former foodstuffs, which are the co/by-products of processing industries, or the food losses generated by the food production chain for human consumption. This paper reviews the by-co-products derived from the transformation of fresh-cut leafy salad crops. A preliminary nutritional evaluation of these materials is thus proposed. Based on their composition and nutritional features, in some cases similar to fresh forage and grasses, this biomass seems to be a suitable feedstuff for selected farm animals, such as ruminants. In conclusion, although the present data are not exhaustive and further studies are needed to weigh up the possible advantages and disadvantages of these materials, fresh-cut leafy salad crops represent a potential unconventional feed ingredient that could help in exploiting the circular economy in livestock production, thereby improving sustainability.

Indexed as

animal nutritionfood wasteformer foodstuffsfresh-cut leafy salad cropsruminantsvegetable by products

Identifiers

PMID32585906
PMCPMC7341183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.