Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32585742›Full record

Trial reportPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2020

10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Postsurgical Pain: Results From a 12-Month Prospective, Multicenter Study.

Mayank Gupta, James Scowcroft, Daniel Kloster, Maged Guirguis, Jonathan Carlson, Tory McJunkin, Gassan Chaiban, Atef Israel, Jeyakumar Subbaroyan

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mayank GuptaKansas Pain Management, Overland Park, Kansas, U.S.A.
James ScowcroftKC Pain Centers, Lee's Summit, Missouri, U.S.A.
Daniel KlosterMenorah Medical Center, Overland Park, Kansas, U.S.A.
Maged GuirguisOchsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
Jonathan CarlsonAZ Pain Specialists, Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A.
Tory McJunkinAZ Pain Specialists, Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A.
Gassan ChaibanOchsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
Atef IsraelMenorah Medical Center, Overland Park, Kansas, U.S.A.
Jeyakumar SubbaroyanNevro Corp, Redwood City, California, U.S.A.
Arizona Pain Specialists · USNevro (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) can be caused by peripheral nerve injury (PNI) resulting from surgical procedures and has a significant neuropathic component. This prospective, single-arm study was conducted to document the effectiveness of 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation (10-kHz SCS) as a treatment for patients with CPSP.

methodsSubjects with CPSP who were refractory to conventional medical interventions and reported pain scores of ≥5 cm on a 10-cm VAS underwent trial stimulations lasting up to 14 days. Epidural leads were implanted at locations appropriate for the primary area of pain, and trials resulting in ≥40% pain relief were considered successful. Subjects with successful trials underwent implantation with a permanent 10-kHz SCS system and were followed for 12 months after implantation.

resultsOf the 34 subjects who underwent trial stimulation, 1 was withdrawn early and 29 (87.9%) had a successful trial and received a permanent implant. After 12 months of treatment, the mean VAS score decreased by 6.5 cm, the response rate was 88.0% (22/25), and 18 subjects (62.1%) were remitters with VAS scores sustained at ≤3.0 cm. Scores for all components of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 were significantly reduced, including affective descriptors of pain. Pain catastrophizing and vigilance, patient function, physical and mental well-being, and sleep quality all improved over the course of the study. No neurologic deficits reported in the study.

conclusions10-kHz SCS is effective and tolerated in patients with CPSP, and further study of its clinical application in this population is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaPain ManagementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesSpinal Cord Stimulation10-kHz SCSchronic postsurgical painvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID32585742
PMCPMC7754504
OpenAlexW3038074597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.