Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32585568›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

A fully automated pipeline for brain structure segmentation in multiple sclerosis.

Sandra González-Villà, Arnau Oliver, Yuankai Huo, Xavier Lladó, Bennett A Landman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra González-VillàInstitute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain; Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA. Electronic address: sgonzalez@eia.udg.edu.
Arnau OliverInstitute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Yuankai HuoElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Xavier LladóInstitute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Bennett A LandmanElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Quantitative Image Analysis Techniques for Optic Nerve DiseaseR21EY024036 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2014 to 2015
$410k
Resource Development for the Java Image Science ToolkitR03EB012461 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2010 to 2010
$147k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NEI NIH HHS R21 EY024036NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB012461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate volume measurements of the brain structures are important for treatment evaluation and disease follow-up in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. With the aim of obtaining reproducible measurements and avoiding the intra-/inter-rater variability that manual delineations introduce, several automated brain structure segmentation strategies have been proposed in recent years. However, most of these strategies tend to be affected by the abnormal MS lesion intensities, which corrupt the structure segmentation result. To address this problem, we recently reformulated two label fusion strategies of the state of the art, improving their segmentation performance on the lesion areas. Here, we integrate these reformulated strategies in a completely automated pipeline that includes pre-processing (inhomogeneity correction and intensity normalization), atlas selection, masked registration and label fusion, and combine them with an automated lesion segmentation method of the state of the art. We study the effect of automating the lesion mask acquisition on the structure segmentation result, analyzing the output of the proposed pipeline when used in combination with manually and automatically segmented lesion masks. We further analyze the effect of those masks on the segmentation result of the original label fusion strategies when combined with the well-established pre-processing step of lesion filling. The experiments performed show that, when the original methods are used to segment the lesion-filled images, significant structure volume differences are observed in a comparison between manually and automatically segmented lesion masks. The results indicate a mean volume decrease of 1.13%±1.93 in the cerebrospinal fluid, and a mean volume increase of 0.13%±0.14 and 0.05%±0.08 in the cerebral white matter and cerebellar gray matter, respectively. On the other hand, no significant volume differences were found when the proposed automated pipeline was used for segmentation, which demonstrates its robustness against variations in the lesion mask used.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultBrainFemaleGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisWhite MatterBrain structuresLabel fusionMRIMulti-atlasMultiple sclerosis lesionsParcellationSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID32585568
PMCPMC7322098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.