ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2021
Standardizing Assessment of Spoken Discourse in Aphasia: A Working Group With Deliverables.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cortical activity during narrative discourse production in individuals with post-stroke aphasia and controls measured via functional near-infrared spectroscopy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Auditory-Perceptual Rating of Four Dimensions of Connected Speech in Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Written picture descriptions distinguish variants of primary progressive aphasia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- A targeted review of prosodic production in agrammatic aphasia.Neuropsychological rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Data-driven classification of narrative speech characteristics in stroke aphasia distinguishes neurological and strategic contributions.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Article
- Reliability of the Brief Assessment of Transactional Success in Communication in Aphasia.Aphasiology · 2025Article
- Protocol for detection and monitoring of post-stroke cognitive impairment through AI-powered speech analysis: a mixed methods pilot study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- The curious case of the Cat Rescue: can picture narrative description inform visuospatial processing in aphasia?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Determinants of Multilevel Discourse Outcomes in Anomia Treatment for Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Open Brain AI and language assessment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Expanding the scope: multimodal dimensions in aphasia discourse analysis-preliminary findings.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Pausing before verb production is associated with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Toward harmonization of strategies for investigating lucidity in AD/ADRD: A preliminary research framework.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Article
- The Discourse Profile in Corticobasal Syndrome: A Comprehensive Clinical and Biomarker Approach.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- A Telemedicine Platform for Aphasia: Protocol for a Development and Usability Study.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Article
- Enhancing the Classification of Aphasia: A Statistical Analysis Using Connected Speech.Aphasiology · 2022Article
- Assessment of language impairment and function.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022Review
- Spoken Discourse Assessment and Analysis in Aphasia: An International Survey of Current Practices.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- A Comparison of Manual Versus Automated Quantitative Production Analysis of Connected Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose The heterogeneous nature of measures, methods, and analyses reported in the aphasia spoken discourse literature precludes comparison of outcomes across studies (e.g., meta-analyses) and inhibits replication. Furthermore, funding and time constraints significantly hinder collecting test-retest data on spoken discourse outcomes. This research note describes the development and structure of a working group, designed to address major gaps in the spoken discourse aphasia literature, including a lack of standardization in methodology, analysis, and reporting, as well as nominal data regarding the psychometric properties of spoken discourse outcomes. Method The initial initiatives for this working group are to (a) propose recommendations regarding standardization of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and reporting in aphasia, based on the results of an international survey and a systematic literature review and (b) create a database of test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia. The survey of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and interpretation procedures was distributed to clinicians and researchers involved in aphasia assessment and rehabilitation from September to November 2019. We will publish survey results and recommend standards for collecting, analyzing, and reporting spoken discourse in aphasia. A multisite endeavor to collect test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia will be initiated. This test-retest information will be contributed to a central site for transcription and analysis, and data will be subsequently openly curated. Conclusion The goal of the working group is to create recommendations for field-wide standards in methods, analysis, and reporting of spoken discourse outcomes, as has been done across other related disciplines (e.g., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research, Committee on Best Practice in Data Analysis and Sharing). Additionally, the creation of a database through our multisite collaboration will allow the identification of psychometrically sound outcome measures and norms that can be used by clinicians and researchers to assess spoken discourse abilities in aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.