ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2020
Pervasive Selection against MicroRNA Target Sites in Human Populations.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population Genetic Structure, Historical Effective Population Size, and Dairy Trait Selection Signatures in Chinese Red Steppe and Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of microRNA target sites across vertebrate evolution.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- The Impact of Population Variation in the Analysis of microRNA Target Sites.Non-coding RNA · 2019Article
- PopTargs: a database for studying population evolutionary genetics of human microRNA target sites.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
MicroRNA target sites are often conserved during evolution and purifying selection to maintain such sites is expected. On the other hand, comparative analyses identified a paucity of microRNA target sites in coexpressed transcripts, and novel target sites can potentially be deleterious. We proposed that selection against novel target sites pervasive. The analysis of derived allele frequencies revealed that, when the derived allele is a target site, the proportion of nontarget sites is higher than expected, particularly for highly expressed microRNAs. Thus, new alleles generating novel microRNA target sites can be deleterious and selected against. When we analyzed ancestral target sites, the derived (nontarget) allele frequency does not show statistical support for microRNA target allele conservation. We investigated the joint effects of microRNA conservation and expression and found that selection against microRNA target sites depends mostly on the expression level of the microRNA. We identified microRNA target sites with relatively high levels of population differentiation. However, when we analyze separately target sites in which the target allele is ancestral to the population, the proportion of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with high Fst significantly increases. These findings support that population differentiation is more likely in target sites that are lost than in the gain of new target sites. Our results indicate that selection against novel microRNA target sites is prevalent and, although individual sites may have a weak selective pressure, the overall effect across untranslated regions is not negligible and should be accounted when studying the evolution of genomic sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.