Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584969›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Concordance of Early and Late End Points for Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Trials.

Stephen M Bart, Sumathi Nambiar, Ramya Gopinath, Daniel Rubin, John J Farley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Understanding Early and Late Endpoints in Registrational Trials of Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen M BartOffice of Infectious Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Sumathi NambiarOffice of Infectious Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Ramya GopinathOffice of Infectious Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Daniel RubinDivision of Biometrics IV, Office of Biostatistics, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
John J FarleyOffice of Infectious Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

FDAOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationResearch Participation ProgramUS Department of EnergyU.S. Food and Drug Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile there are ongoing regulatory convergence efforts, differences remain in primary end points recommended for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) trials. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends assessing CABP symptom resolution at an early time point (3-5 days after randomization). Other regulatory agencies recommend assessing overall clinical response at a later time point (5-10 days after therapy ends).

methodsWe analyzed participant-level data from 6 recent CABP trials submitted to the FDA (n = 4645 participants) to evaluate concordance between early and late end-point outcomes. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with discordance.

resultsEarly and late end-point outcomes were concordant for 85.6% of participants. The proportions of early end-point responders that ultimately failed and early end-point nonresponders that ultimately succeeded were similar (6.0% vs 8.4%, respectively). Early end-point response was highly predictive of late end-point success (positive predictive value, 92.9%). Multivariate logistic regression identified early end-point responders/late end-point failures as less likely to be obese and more likely to be infected with Chlamydophila pneumoniae or Staphylococcus aureus, have received antibacterial drug therapy prior to randomization, and have severe chest pain at baseline. The most common investigator-provided reasons for failure among early end-point responders/late end-point failures were receipt of nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy and loss to follow-up.

conclusionsEarly and late end-point outcomes were highly concordant. These data may be useful in the continuing efforts to reach international regulatory convergence on CABP clinical trial design recommendations.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsPneumonia, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantibacterial drug developmentcommunity-acquired bacterial pneumoniaearly clinical responseend point

Identifiers

PMID32584969
OpenAlexW3037624378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.