Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584840›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

'One-size doesn't fit all': Understanding healthcare practitioners' perceptions, attitudes and behaviours towards sexual and reproductive health and rights in low resource settings: An exploratory qualitative study.

Gilbert Tumwine, Jack Palmieri, Markus Larsson, Christina Gummesson, Pius Okong, Per-Olof Östergren, Anette Agardh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sexual Pleasure and Healthcare Settings: Focusing on Pleasure to Improve Healthcare Delivery and Utilization.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
    Article
  8. The World Association for Sexual Health's Declaration on Sexual Pleasure: A Technical Guide.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gilbert TumwineSocial Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7900-2919
Jack PalmieriSocial Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7430-3157
Markus LarssonSocial Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Christina GummessonCentre for Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pius OkongHealth Service Commission, Kampala, Uganda.
Per-Olof ÖstergrenSocial Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Anette AgardhSocial Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SEUganda Blood Transfusion Service · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although progress has been made to improve access to sexual and reproductive health services globally in the past two decades, in many low-income countries, improvements have been slow. Discrimination against vulnerable groups and failure to address health inequities openly and comprehensively play a role in this stagnation. Healthcare practitioners are important actors who, often alone, decide who accesses services and how. This study explores how health care practitioners perceive sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and how background factors influence them during service delivery. Participants were a purposefully selected sample of health practitioners from five low income countries attending a training in at Lund University, Sweden. Semi-structured interviews and qualitative content analysis were used. Three themes emerged. The first theme, "one-size doesn't fit all' in SRHR" reflects health practitioners' perception of SRHR. Although they perceived rights as fundamental to sexual and reproductive health, exercising of these rights was perceived to be context-specific. The second theme, "aligning a pathway to service delivery", illustrates a reflective balancing act between their personal values and societal norms in service delivery, while the third theme, "health practitioners acting as gatekeepers", describes how this balancing act oscillates between enabling and blocking behaviours. The findings suggest that, even though health care practitioners perceive SRHR as fundamental rights, their preparedness to ensure that these rights were upheld in service delivery is influenced by personal values and society norms. This could lead to actions that enable or block service delivery.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDelivery of Health CareHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth ResourcesQualitative ResearchReproductive HealthRight to HealthSexual HealthFemaleHumansMaleReproductive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID32584840
PMCPMC7316327
OpenAlexW3037613400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.