Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584835›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

End of an era of administering erythropoiesis stimulating agents among Veterans Administration cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Shamia Hoque, Brian J Chen, Martin W Schoen, Kenneth R Carson, Jesse Keller, Bartlett J Witherspoon, Kevin B Knopf, Y Tony Yang, Benjamin Schooley, Chadi Nabhan and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shamia HoqueDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5087-7842
Brian J ChenArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Martin W SchoenDepartment of Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6388-5553
Kenneth R CarsonThe Washington University School of Medicine and the Saint Louis VA Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Jesse KellerThe Washington University School of Medicine and the Saint Louis VA Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Bartlett J WitherspoonMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Kevin B KnopfCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Y Tony YangGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Benjamin SchooleyDepartment of Integrated Information Technology, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Chadi NabhanCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Oliver SartorTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
Paul R YarnoldMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Paul RayCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Laura BoboltsOncology Analytics, Plantation, Florida, United States of America.
William J HrusheskyThe Washington University School of Medicine and the Saint Louis VA Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Michael DicksonCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Charles L BennettCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
University of South Carolina · USMedical University of South Carolina · USSt. Louis VA Medical Center · USGeorge Washington University · USNova Southeastern University · USSaint Louis University · USTulane University · US

Funding

Research for Adverse Drug-Events And Reports (RADAR)R01CA102713 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WEST, DENNIS PAUL · 2003 to 2010
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erythropoisis stimulating agent (ESA) use was addressed in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) meetings between 2004 and 2008. FDA safety-focused regulatory actions occurred in 2007 and 2008. In 2007, black box warnings advised of early death and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks with ESAs in oncology. In 2010, a Risk Evaluation Strategies (REMS) was initiated, with cancer patient consent that mortality and VTE risks were noted with ESAs. We report warnings and REMS impacts on ESA utilization among Veterans Administration (VA) cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Data were from Veterans Affairs database (2003-2012). Epoetin and darbepoetin use were primary outcomes. Segmented linear regression was used to estimate changes in ESA use levels and trends, clinical appropriateness, and adverse events (VTEs) among chemotherapy-treated cancer patients. To estimate changes in level of drug prescription rate after policy actions, model-specific indicator variables as covariates based on specific actions were included. ESA use fell by 95% and 90% from 2005, for epoetin and darbepoetin, from 22% and 11%, respectively, to 1% and 1%, respectively, among cancer patients with CIA, respectively (p<0.01). Following REMS in 2010, mean hematocrit levels at ESA initiation decreased from 30% to 21% (p<0.01). Black box warnings preceded decreased ESA use among VA cancer patients with CIA. REMS was followed by reduced hematocrit levels at ESA initiation. Our findings contrast with privately- insured and Medicaid insured cancer patient data on chemotherapy-induced anemia where ESA use decreased to 3% to 7% by 2010-2012. By 2012, the era of ESA administration to VA to cancer patients had ended but the warnings remain relevant and significant. In 2019, oncology/hematology national guidelines (ASCO/ASH) recommend that cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia should receive ESAs or red blood cell transfusions after risk-benefit evaluation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaAntineoplastic AgentsDrug LabelingFemaleHematinicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVenous ThromboembolismAntineoplastic AgentsHematinics

Identifiers

PMID32584835
PMCPMC7316310
OpenAlexW3037793920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.