Observational studyJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020
Indications for Rituximab Use in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.
Observational study in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Targeting B-Cell-Activating Factor and Its Receptor in Immune Thrombocytopenia and Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia.American journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Severe Reactions to Rituximab in Children: A Cohort Study of Rituximab-Induced Serum Sickness and Anaphylaxis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The influence of targeted therapies in the inner ear.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Immunotherapies for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, other common autonomic disorders, and Long COVID: current state and future direction.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Rituximab-induced serum sickness in immunobullous disorders: A case series.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- The Acquisition of Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity by the Type II Anti-CD20 Therapeutic Antibody Obinutuzumab.Cancers · 2023Article
- Real-life drug retention rate and safety of rituximab when treating rheumatic diseases: a single-centre Swiss retrospective cohort study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2023Article
- Validity of Italian administrative healthcare data in describing the real-world utilization of infusive antineoplastic drugs: the study case of rituximab use in patients treated at the University Hospital of Siena for onco-haematological indications.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Rituximab treatment in myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies in Treating Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: New Drugs for an Old Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Worked to the bone: antibody-based conditioning as the future of transplant biology.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- What Have Failed, Interrupted, and Withdrawn Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Taught Us?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Review
- Role of Rituximab in the Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris: Patient Selection and Acceptability.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Review
- B cells promote CD8 T cell primary and memory responses to subunit vaccines.Cell reports · 2021Article
- The Profile of Use of Rituximab in Tertiary Care Hospitals of Central India.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRituximab is a top-selling biologic that was first approved by the FDA in 1997 for a non-Hodgkin lymphoma orphan indication. It has since been approved for additional orphan indications, with rheumatoid arthritis as the only FDA-approved, nonorphan indication. Evidence suggests that rituximab is frequently used off-label, but information on its use over time and indications for use in the United States is limited.
objectiveTo assess incident rituximab use over time in an integrated health care delivery system.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Data were collected from administrative databases and manual chart reviews. Patients who received their first rituximab infusion between October 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017, and who were not a part of a clinical trial were included. Indication for use (FDA-approved orphan/nonorphan, off-label) was determined. Proportions of use were assessed over time. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to assess factors associated with receiving rituximab for an FDA-approved indication.
resultsA total of 1,674 patients were included. The majority (66.4%) of patients had an FDA-approved indication, with lymphoma being the most common approved indication (66.4%). The most common indication for off-label use was neurologic conditions (72.7%), predominantly demyelinating diseases. Off-label indication use increased from 1.2% in 2009 to 55.6% in 2017. Factors associated with rituximab use for an FDA-approved indication included increased age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.07) and increased burden of chronic disease (chronic disease score: AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12; Charlson Comorbidity Index score: AOR = 3.52, 95% CI = 3.03-4.10).
conclusionsOff-label use of rituximab grew dramatically over the course of the study. With the recent FDA approval of the rituximab biosimilar and its expected lower price, off-label use will likely continue to rise. Opportunities for cost savings and to ensure appropriate use of these medications should be evaluated. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente. All authors except Hansen are employed by Kaiser Permanente. Hansen has nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were presented at the Mountain States Conference for Residents and Preceptors in May 2019 in Salt Lake City, UT, and at an encore presentation October 2019 at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting in New York, NY.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.