ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020
Magnitude, time course, and specificity of rapid adaptation across mouse visual areas.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrinsic timing, not temporal prediction, underlies ramping dynamics in visual and parietal cortex during passive behavior.Science advances · 2026Article
- Context-dependent effects of SOM neurons to enhance the responses of corticocollicular neurons to repetitive sounds.iScience · 2026Article
- DART.2: bidirectional synaptic pharmacology with thousandfold cellular specificity.Nature methods · 2024Article
- Mammals Achieve Common Neural Coverage of Visual Scenes Using Distinct Sampling Behaviors.eNeuro · 2024Article
- A power law describes the magnitude of adaptation in neural populations of primary visual cortex.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Repeated passive visual experience modulates spontaneous and non-familiar stimuli-evoked neural activity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- The influence of stimulus history on directional coding in the monarch butterfly brain.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023Article
- 110 μm thin endo-microscope for deep-brain in vivo observations of neuronal connectivity, activity and blood flow dynamics.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Input-specific synaptic depression shapes temporal integration in mouse visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Brief Stimuli Cast a Persistent Long-Term Trace in Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Rapid visual adaptation persists across saccades.iScience · 2021Article
- Adjudicating Between Local and Global Architectures of Predictive Processing in the Subcortical Auditory Pathway.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Review
- Mouse Higher Visual Areas Provide Both Distributed and Specialized Contributions to Visually Guided Behaviors.Current biology : CB · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptation is a ubiquitous feature of sensory processing whereby recent experience shapes future responses. The mouse primary visual cortex (V1) is particularly sensitive to recent experience, where a brief stimulus can suppress subsequent responses for seconds. This rapid adaptation profoundly impacts perception, suggesting that its effects are propagated along the visual hierarchy. To understand how rapid adaptation influences sensory processing, we measured its effects at key nodes in the visual system: in V1, three higher visual areas (HVAs: lateromedial, anterolateral, and posteromedial), and the superior colliculus (SC) in awake mice of both sexes using single-unit recordings. Consistent with the feed-forward propagation of adaptation along the visual hierarchy, we find that neurons in layer 4 adapt less strongly than those in other layers of V1. Furthermore, neurons in the HVAs adapt more strongly, and recover more slowly, than those in V1. The magnitude and time course of adaptation was comparable in each of the HVAs and in the SC, suggesting that adaptation may not linearly accumulate along the feed-forward visual processing hierarchy. Despite the increase in adaptation in the HVAs compared with V1, the effects were similarly orientation specific across all areas. These data reveal that adaptation profoundly shapes cortical processing, with increasing impact at higher levels in the cortical hierarchy, and also strongly influencing computations in the SC. Thus, we find robust, brain-wide effects of rapid adaptation on sensory processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.