Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584630›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020

Efficacy and Safety of Vandetanib in Progressive and Symptomatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis From the ZETA Trial.

Michael C Kreissl, Lars Bastholt, Rossella Elisei, Robert Haddad, Ole Hauch, Barbara Jarząb, Bruce Robinson, Raffaella Colzani, Meredith Foster, Richard Weiss and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Covalent FAPI Imaging-Guided Precision Surgery in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Phase II Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Selpercatinib in the treatment of thyroid cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Systemic therapies for medullary thyroid carcinoma: state of the art.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Evolving Treatment Landscape of Medullary Thyroid Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  17. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Michael C KreisslDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lars BastholtDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Rossella EliseiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Robert HaddadDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Ole HauchHauch Consultancy, Brussels, Belgium.
Barbara JarząbDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Bruce RobinsonSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Raffaella ColzaniSanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA.
Meredith FosterSanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA.
Richard WeissDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Martin SchlumbergerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Harvard University · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FROdense University Hospital · DKThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe conducted a post hoc analysis of the vandetanib phase III trial involving patients with advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) to assess the efficacy and safety of vandetanib in patients with progressive and symptomatic MTC. The primary objective of the analysis was to determine progression-free survival (PFS) of these patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligible patients from the ZETA trial were divided into 4 disease severity subgroups: progression and symptoms, symptoms only, progression only, and no progression and no symptoms assessed at baseline. PFS, determined from objective tumor measurements performed by the local investigator, overall survival (OS), time to worsening of pain (TWP), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated.

resultsOf the 331 patients in this trial, 184 had symptomatic and progressive disease at baseline. In this subgroup, results were similar in magnitude to those observed in the overall trial for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.64;

conclusionVandetanib demonstrated clinical benefit-specifically, increased PFS-in patients with symptomatic and progressive MTC.

Indexed as

AdultCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesQuinazolinesSurvival AnalysisThyroid NeoplasmsPiperidinesQuinazolinesvandetanib

Identifiers

PMID32584630
PMCPMC7430220
OpenAlexW3037154816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.