Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584579›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2020

Improving Proteoform Identifications in Complex Systems Through Integration of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Data.

Leah V Schaffer, Robert J Millikin, Michael R Shortreed, Mark Scalf, Lloyd M Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah V SchafferDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6339-9141
Robert J MillikinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7440-3695
Michael R ShortreedDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Mark ScalfDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Lloyd M SmithDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008349 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, BRIAN G · 1989 to 2019
$22.5M
Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
Revealing Proteoforms: The Primary Effectors of Biological FunctionR35GM126914 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lloyd M Smith · 2018 to 2026
$6.2M
An Integrated Microfluidic System for the Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up ProteomicsR01EB025268 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TIMPERMAN, AARON T · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025268NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126914NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular functions are performed by a vast and diverse set of proteoforms. Proteoforms are the specific forms of proteins produced as a result of genetic variations, RNA splicing, and post-translational modifications (PTMs). Top-down mass spectrometric analysis of intact proteins enables proteoform identification, including proteoforms derived from sequence cleavage events or harboring multiple PTMs. In contrast, bottom-up proteomics identifies peptides, which necessitates protein inference and does not yield proteoform identifications. We seek here to exploit the synergies between these two data types to improve the quality and depth of the overall proteomic analysis. To this end, we automated the large-scale integration of results from multiprotease bottom-up and top-down analyses in the software program Proteoform Suite and applied it to the analysis of proteoforms from the human Jurkat T lymphocyte cell line. We implemented the recently developed proteoform-level classification scheme for top-down tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) identifications in Proteoform Suite, which enables users to observe the level and type of ambiguity for each proteoform identification, including which of the ambiguous proteoform identifications are supported by bottom-up-level evidence. We used Proteoform Suite to find instances where top-down identifications aid in protein inference from bottom-up analysis and conversely where bottom-up peptide identifications aid in proteoform PTM localization. We also show the use of bottom-up data to infer proteoform candidates potentially present in the sample, allowing confirmation of such proteoform candidates by intact-mass analysis of MS1 spectra. The implementation of these capabilities in the freely available software program Proteoform Suite enables users to integrate large-scale top-down and bottom-up data sets and to utilize the synergies between them to improve and extend the proteomic analysis.

Indexed as

ProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomeSoftwareProteomebottom-up proteomicspost-translational modificationprotein inferenceproteoformssoftwaretop-down proteomics

Identifiers

PMID32584579
PMCPMC7490796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.