Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584516›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2020

Racial Disparities in Medication Adherence between African American and Caucasian Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Associated Factors.

Kai Sun, Amanda M Eudy, Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber, Rebecca E Sadun, Jennifer L Rogers, Jayanth Doss, Amy L Corneli, Hayden B Bosworth, Megan E B Clowse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A glimpse into the future of systemic lupus erythematosus.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai SunDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-2932
Amanda M EudyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Lisa G Criscione-SchreiberDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Rebecca E SadunDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Jennifer L RogersDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1755-7684
Jayanth DossDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Amy L CorneliDepartment of Population Health Sciences and Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Hayden B BosworthDepartment of Population Health Sciences and Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Megan E B ClowseDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-3470
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Research Project 3U54MD012530 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KIMBERLY S. · 2017 to 2022
$8.8M
Duke Center for REsearch to AdvanCe Healthcare Equity (REACH Equity) Career Development Award NIH 5U54MD012530-02NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMedication nonadherence is more common in African Americans compared with Caucasians. We examined the racial adherence gaps among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and explored factors associated with nonadherence.

methodsCross-sectional data were obtained from consecutive patients prescribed SLE medications seen at an academic lupus clinic between August 2018 and February 2019. Adherence was measured using both self-report and pharmacy refill data. High composite adherence was defined as having both high self-reported adherence and high refill rates. Covariates were patient-provider interaction, patient-reported health status, and clinical factors. We compared adherence rates by race and used race-stratified analyses to identify factors associated with low composite adherence.

resultsAmong 121 patients (37% Caucasian, 63% African American), the median age was 44 years (range 22-72), 95% were female, 51% had a college education or more, 46% had private insurance, and 38% had high composite adherence. Those with low composite adherence had higher damage scores, patient-reported disease activity scores, and more acute care visits. High composite adherence rate was lower among African Americans compared with Caucasians (30% vs 51%, P = 0.02), and the gap was largest for those taking mycophenolate (26% vs 75%, P = 0.01). Among African Americans, low composite adherence was associated with perceiving fewer "Compassionate respectful" interactions with providers and worse anxiety and negative affect. In contrast, among Caucasians, low composite adherence was only associated with higher SLE medication regimen burden and fibromyalgia pain score.

conclusionSignificant racial disparities exist in SLE medication adherence, which likely contributes to racial disparities in SLE outcomes. Interventions may be more effective if tailored by race, such as improving patient-provider interaction and mental health among African Americans.

Identifiers

PMID32584516
PMCPMC7368138
OpenAlexW3037344983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.