Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584409›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Association Between Age and Complications After Outpatient Colonoscopy.

Natalia Causada-Calo, Kirles Bishay, Siwar Albashir, Ahmed Al Mazroui, David Armstrong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07445178 (Piecemeal Resection and Advanced Histology Independently Predict Local Recurrence After Colorectal Snare-based Endoscopic Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07445178 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Piecemeal Resection and Advanced Histology Independently Predict Local Recurrence After Colorectal Snare-based Endoscopic Resection: a Time-to-event Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2025 to 2026Enrolled255ConditionsColo-rectal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management of Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesions in Elderly Patients.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adverse Events After Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults in a Large Integrated Health System in the United States.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Incidence of Serious Complications following Screening Colonoscopy in Adults Ages 76 to 85 Years.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Causada-CaloDivision of Gastroenterology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kirles BishayDivision of Gastroenterology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Siwar AlbashirDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ahmed Al MazrouiDivision of Gastroenterology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David ArmstrongDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are insufficient data describing the incidence and risk factors of postcolonoscopy complications in older individuals. Objective: To assess the association between older age (≥75 years) and the risk of postcolonoscopy complications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study included adults (≥50 years) undergoing outpatient colonoscopy between April 2008 and September 2017, identified from Ontario administrative databases. Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease and hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes were excluded. The study population was subdivided into a colorectal cancer screening-eligible cohort (patients aged 50-74 years) and an older cohort (patients aged ≥75 years). The statistical analysis was conducted from December 2018 to September 2019. Exposures: Older age (≥75 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was postcolonoscopy complications, defined as the composite of hospitalization or emergency department visits in the 30-day period after the outpatient colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included incidence of surgically treated colorectal cancer and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Independent variables associated with postcolonoscopy complications were also assessed. Results: The study sample included 38 069 patients; the mean (SD) age was 65.2 (10.1) years, there were 19 037 women (50.0%), and 27 831 patients (73.1%) underwent a first colonoscopy. The cumulative incidence of complications was 3.4% (1310 patients) in the overall population, and it was higher in individuals aged 75 years or older (515 of 7627 patients [6.8%]) than in screening-eligible cohort (795 of 30 443 patients [2.6%]) (P < .001). Independent risk factors for postcolonoscopy complications were age 75 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% CI, 2.0-2.6), anemia (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7), cardiac arrhythmia (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2), congestive heart failure (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.5-4.6), hypertension (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5), chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0), liver disease (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.5-6.5), smoking history (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.4-4.3), and obesity (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.2). The number of previous colonoscopies was associated with a lower risk of complications (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.0). The incidence of surgically treated colorectal cancer was higher in the older cohort than the screening-eligible cohort (119 patients [1.6%] vs 144 patients [0.5%]; P < .001). All-cause mortality rates were 0.1% overall (39 patients) and 0.1% (19 patients) for individuals aged 50 to 74 years and 0.2% (20 patients) for those aged 75 years and older (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study of individuals living in southern Ontario, age of 75 years and older was associated with a higher risk of 30-day postprocedure complications after outpatient colonoscopy. These findings suggest that the decision to perform a colonoscopy should be carefully considered in patients older than 75 years, especially in the presence of comorbidities. Further studies are needed to better understand the benefits of invasive procedures as opposed to less invasive approaches for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance among older patients.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAmbulatory CareColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32584409
PMCPMC7317606
OpenAlexW3037276745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.