Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584367›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Capecitabine vs Trastuzumab Emtansine Alone in Patients With Previously Treated ERBB2 (HER2)-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 and Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

Javier Cortés, Véronique Diéras, Sylvie Lorenzen, Filippo Montemurro, Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild, Peter Thuss-Patience, Giacomo Allegrini, Michelino De Laurentiis, Caroline Lohrisch, Eva Oravcová and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01702558 (Phase I Study of the Combination of Trastuzumab Emtansine), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01702558 phase2terminatednot on this map

Phase I Study of the Combination of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and HER2-Positive Locally Advanced/Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients, Followed by a Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Capecitabine Versus Trastuzumab Emtansine Alone in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2012 to 2017Enrolled182ConditionsBreast Cancer, Gastric CancerArmsCapecitabine, Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Targeting HER2 across Cancer Subtypes: A Pan-Tumor Approach.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Personalized treatment approach for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Antibody-drug conjugates combinations in cancer treatment.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Javier CortésQuirónsalud Group, IOB Institute of Oncology, Madrid, Spain.
Véronique DiérasCentre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Sylvie LorenzenHematology/Medical Oncology, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Filippo MontemurroMultidisciplinary Oncology Outpatient Clinic, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Jorge Riera-KnorrenschildKlinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.
Peter Thuss-PatienceDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Giacomo AllegriniDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Pontedera Hospital, Azienda L Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisDivision of Breast Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy.
Caroline LohrischBC Cancer, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Eva Oravcová2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Jose M Perez-GarciaQuirónsalud Group, IOB Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesco RicciInstitut Curie, Paris, France.
Dina SakaevaDepartment of Chemotherapy, Republican Clinical Oncology Center, Ufa, Russia.
Rosanne SerpanchyBC Cancer, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jozef Šufliarský2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Maria VidalVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Natsumi IraharaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Christine WohlfarthF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Mounir AoutF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Karen GelmonBC Cancer, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHComenius University Bratislava · SKHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital of Prato · ITInstitut Curie · FRIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: ERBB2 (HER2)-targeted therapy provides benefits in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and gastric cancer, but additional treatments are needed to maximize efficacy and quality of life. Objective: To determine maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC and locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (LA/mGC) (phase 1) and the efficacy and safety of this combination vs T-DM1 alone in patients with mBC (phase 2). Design, Setting, and Participants: The MTD in phase 1 was assessed using a 3 + 3 design with capecitabine dose modification. Phase 2 was an open-label, randomized, international multicenter study of patients with mBC treated with T-DM1 plus capecitabine or T-DM1 alone. Eligible patients had previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC or LA/mGC with no prior chemotherapy treatment for advanced disease. Interventions: Patients in the phase 1 mBC cohort received capecitabine (750 mg/m2, 700 mg/m2, or 650 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle) plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients with LA/mGC received capecitabine at the mBC phase 1 MTD, de-escalating as needed, plus T-DM1 2.4 mg/kg weekly. In phase 2, patients with mBC were randomized (1:1) to receive capecitabine (at the phase 1 MTD) plus T-DM1 or T-DM1 alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The phase 1 primary objective was to identify the MTD of capecitabine plus T-DM1. The phase 2 primary outcome was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Results: In phase 1, the median (range) age was 54.0 (37-71) and 57.5 (53-70) years for patients with mBC and patients with LA/mGC, respectively. The capecitabine MTD was identified as 700 mg/m2 in 11 patients with mBC and 6 patients with LA/mGC evaluable for dose-limiting toxic effects. In phase 2, between October 2014 and April 2016, patients with mBC (median [range] age, 52.0 [28-80] years) were randomized to receive combination therapy (n = 81) or T-DM1 (n = 80). The ORR was 44% (36 of 81 patients) and 36% (29 of 80 patients) in the combination and T-DM1 groups, respectively (difference, 8.2%; 90% CI, -4.5 to 20.9; P = .34; clinical cutoff, May 31, 2017). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 78 of 82 patients (95%) in the combination group, with 36 (44%) experiencing grade 3-4 AEs, and 69 of 78 patients (88%) in the T-DM1 group, with 32 (41%) experiencing grade 3-4 AEs. No grade 5 AEs were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: Adding capecitabine to T-DM1 did not statistically increase ORR associated with T-DM1 in patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC. The combination group reported more AEs, but with no unexpected toxic effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01702558.

Indexed as

Ado-Trastuzumab EmtansineAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCapecitabineERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID32584367
PMCPMC7317656
OpenAlexW3037873371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.