Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584313›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Appraisal of EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions: A single Chinese center experience.

Sijie Hao, Weiqun Ding, Yuqin Jin, Yang Di, Feng Yang, Hang He, Hengchao Li, Chen Jin, Deliang Fu, Liang Zhong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Accuracy and agreement of a large panel of endosonographers for endomicroscopy-guided virtual biopsy of pancreatic cystic lesions.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sijie HaoDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weiqun DingGastroenterology and Endoscopy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuqin JinGastroenterology and Endoscopy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yang DiDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Feng YangDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hang HeDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hengchao LiDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chen JinDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Deliang FuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liang ZhongGastroenterology and Endoscopy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CNHuashan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIn the recent years, EUS is one of the routine procedures in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) is a novel minimally invasive imaging technique in diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. The pilot researches provided us some preliminary findings and conclusions with small samples, low rate of pathological correspondence. The aim of this current study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of EUS-guided nCLE in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) and pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) based on large samples. The date was obtained on nCLE imaging findings and high rate of correlation with pathology. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients enrolled in the study were underwent EUS-nCLE to achieve the nCLE images and diagnosis. Comparing with the final diagnosis, including surgical histopathological results or cyto-/histopathology through FNA, the efficacy and accuracy of nCLE in diagnosis in solid and cystic pancreatic lesions were evaluated. In other cases, clinical diagnoses were achieved based on the combination with clinical history, image findings and fluid analysis and cytology, by 3 independent committee members strongly agreed with a concordant diagnosis.

resultsTotally 172 patients were enrolled into the study. The overall rate of final diagnosis was about 65% while 50% in cystic lesion. The mean sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy of the nCLE in diagnosis of PDAC is 90.3%, 89.5%, 93.3%, 85.0% and 90.0% respectively. The efficacy and accuracy of pancreatic cystic lesions were very satisfying and some additional nCLE signs were found, including "black aggregates of cells, forming as gland-like structure, surrounding by fibro and vessels" in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); "black columnar protrusions near vascular area" in the pseudopapillary solid tumor (SPT); macrophage in tuberculosis (TB) and small aggregate of black regular cells maybe corresponds to ovarian-like stroma in mucinous cystadenoma (MCN). In the study, 20 (11.6%) patients suffered complications, including symptomatic (5.2%) and asymptomatic (6.4%).

conclusionsnCLE observation could improve characterization of indeterminate cysts, or confirm the EUS impression, when cytological confirmation is missing. The technique may deliver information to better guide our clinical decisions.

Indexed as

EUSnCLEpancreatic cystic lesionssolid pancreatic lesion

Identifiers

PMID32584313
PMCPMC7430905
OpenAlexW3038023234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.