Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584257›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks.

Rosa Rugani, Giorgio Vallortigara, Konstantinos Priftis, Lucia Regolin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cognitive bridge between geometric and numerical learning in monkeys.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reply to Pitt et al.: Evidence from bees is consistent with a biological origin of a left-to-right mental number line.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An insect brain organizes numbers on a left-to-right mental number line.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosa RuganiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5294-6306
Giorgio VallortigaraCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8192-9062
Konstantinos PriftisDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-4621
Lucia RegolinDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-0309
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

Horizon 2020 795242 SNANeBHorizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme 833504 SPANUMBRAMinistry of Education, University and Research Department of ExcellencePRIN 2017 ERC-SH4-A 2017PSRHPZ
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We associate small numbers with the left and large numbers with the right side of space. Recent evidence from human newborns and non-human animals has challenged the primary role assigned to culture, in determining this spatial numerical association (SNA). Nevertheless, the effect of individual spatial biases has not been considered in previous research. Here, we tested the effect of numerical magnitude in SNA and we controlled for itablendividual biases. We trained 3-day-old chicks (

Indexed as

Biological Variation, IndividualSpace PerceptionAnimalsAnimals, NewbornChickensFunctional LateralityRandom Allocationchickendomestic chicksGallus gallusmental number lineneurosciencenumber sensespatial numerical association

Identifiers

PMID32584257
PMCPMC7316507
OpenAlexW3037176309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.