Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584237›Full record

ReviewTurkish thoracic journal2020

Turkish Thoracic Society Experts Consensus Report: Recommendations for Pulmonary Function Tests During and After COVID 19 Pandemic.

Bilun Gemicioğlu, Şermin Börekçi, Aslı Görek Dilektaşlı, Gaye Ulubay, Özlem Azap, Sevgi Saryal

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish thoracic journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04526925 naterminatednot on this map

A Physiologic Research to Assess the Effect of an Inline Filter During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET): A Healthy Volunteer Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2020 to 2020Enrolled10ConditionsTransmission, Patient-ProfessionalArmsRespiratory filter in-line placed with the standard mouthpiece, Standard mouthpiece
NCT04826731 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Respiratory Exerciser on Pulmonary Functions of COVID-19 Patients, A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDiskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled14ConditionsCovid19, Respiratory Function Loss, Coronavirus Infection, Pneumonia, ViralArmsIncentive Spirometer/Respiratory Exerciser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bilun GemicioğluDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5953-4881
Şermin BörekçiDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-1312
Aslı Görek DilektaşlıDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-9647
Gaye UlubayDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2478-9985
Özlem AzapDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3171-8926
Sevgi SaryalDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-5226
Turkish Society of Hematology · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recommendation of conducting pulmonary function tests (PFTs) from different societies during and after the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was rated by the experts of the Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS) and presented as the TTS experts consensus report. Information about the topic has been provided.Globally, as of mid-May 2020, there have been over 4.4 million confirmed cases of COVID-19. There are two main routes of transmission of COVID-19: respiratory droplets and contact transmission. PFTs are non-invasive tests that are commonly performed in routine assessment and follow-up of patients in the pulmonology units. However, PFTs may generate aerosols and require sharing common surfaces. With regard to the high prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the community, PFTs should not be performed routinely in confirmed or suspected patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic. Because of the risk of human-to-human transmission of COVID-19, PFTs should be restricted to a small patient population with selected indications. Triage for COVID-19 should be performed prior to testing. Only essential PFTs such as spirometry, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), arterial blood gas analysis, or pulse oximetry should be performed in the selected cases. Tests should be scheduled to allow sufficient time for donning and doffing of the technical personnel with the full personal protective equipment (PPE) (gown, a filtering respirator mask, goggles or full-face shield, and disposable gloves), ventilation of the room, and application of post-test cleaning and disinfection procedures of the equipment and the testing room.

Identifiers

PMID32584237
PMCPMC7311158
OpenAlexW3033899161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.