Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584134›Full record

ArticlePhysiological research2020

Elevated Tenascin-C Serum Levels in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis.

K Bubová, K Prajzlerová, H Hulejová, M Gregová, K Mintálová, M Hušáková, Š Forejtová, M Filková, M Tomčík, J Vencovský and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K BubováInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic. senolt@revma.cz.
K Prajzlerová
H Hulejová
M Gregová
K Mintálová
M Hušáková
Š Forejtová
M Filková
M Tomčík
J Vencovský
K Pavelka
L Šenolt
Institute of Rheumatology · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine serum tenascin C (TNC) in different subsets of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. Sixty-one patients fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axSpA and 20 healthy subjects (HS) were included in study. Based on imaging, patients were classified as non-radiographic (n=16) and radiographic (n=45) axSpA. TNC serum levels were determined by ELISA. Disease-related factors including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, were determined. TNC levels were elevated in axSpA patients [535.3 (457.7-677.2) ng/ml] compared to HS [432.1 (329.1-565.9) ng/ml, p=0.007]. Dividing axSpA into radiographic and non-radiographic subsets, the difference in TNC was observed between the radiographic subset and HS [535.3 (434.5-677.2) vs. 432.1 (329.1-565.9) ng/ml, p=0.022]. TNC levels did not correlate with disease activity measures (serum CRP or BASDAI). Nevertheless, the weak correlation of TNC levels with different disease stages (r=0.25, p=0.025) was found, with the highest levels in patients with syndesmophytes. TNC levels are elevated across various subsets of axSpA, and although not related to systemic disease activity, TNC levels might reflect chronic structural spinal changes in axSpA patients. However, its specific role in bone metabolism should be elucidated in further studies.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansMaleSeverity of Illness IndexSpondylarthritisTenascinBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinTenascinTNC protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32584134
PMCPMC8549897
OpenAlexW3037673057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.