Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584118›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health psychology2020

Put you down versus tune you out: Further understanding active and passive e-mail incivility.

Zhenyu Yuan, YoungAh Park, Michael T Sliter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhenyu YuanDepartment of Managerial Studies.ORCID 0000-0002-7971-887X
YoungAh ParkSchool of Labor and Employment Relations.ORCID 0000-0001-9979-6202
Michael T SliterO.E. Strategies, Inc.
Health Strat (Kenya) · KEImperial Valley College · US

Funding

The Heartland Center for Occupational Health and Safety Education and Research CenterT42OH008491 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI O'SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK T · 2005 to 2025
$31.7M
ACL HHS T42OH008491Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthNIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008491University of Iowa; Heartland Center for Occupational Health and Safety
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although e-mail incivility is becoming a growing concern in the workplace, it remains an understudied topic. Scholars have paid inadequate attention to its dimensionality (i.e., active and passive e-mail incivility) and its impact on well-being outcomes, thus precluding a more comprehensive understanding of its implications in the workplace. To address these gaps, we conducted two studies to investigate the nature and outcomes of e-mail incivility. In Study 1, we surveyed a sample of working employees about their e-mail incivility experiences at work and collected their appraisals of a discrete e-mail incivility event. Confirmatory factor analysis results provide support for the empirical distinction between the 2 dimensions. Findings from event-level appraisals highlight that active e-mail incivility leads to a greater level of emotionality appraisal, whereas passive e-mail incivility is viewed as more ambiguous. In Study 2, we conducted a diary study to examine the spillover effects of e-mail incivility on well-being. Multilevel modeling results indicate that passive e-mail incivility is positively associated with insomnia, which then leads to heightened negative affect at the beginning of the workday. Overall, this research clarifies the nature of e-mail incivility dimensions, highlights their detrimental effects on employee well-being, and identifies important implications for occupational health scholars and practitioners. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Electronic MailIncivilityInterpersonal RelationsAdultDiaries as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID32584118
PMCPMC8362923
OpenAlexW3037374522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.