Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32584067›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2022

Alterations in facial expressions of emotion: Determining the promise of ultrathin slicing approaches and comparing human and automated coding methods in psychosis risk.

Tina Gupta, Claudia M Haase, Gregory P Strauss, Alex S Cohen, Jordyn R Ricard, Vijay A Mittal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automating the analysis of facial emotion expression dynamics: A computational framework and application in psychotic disorders.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tina GuptaDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0003-0160-3201
Claudia M HaaseSchool of Education and Social Policy.
Gregory P StraussDepartment of Psychology.
Alex S CohenDepartment of Psychology.
Jordyn R RicardSchool of Education and Social Policy.
Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology.

Funding

Prodromal Inventory for Negative Symptoms (PINS): A Development and Validation StudyR01MH116039 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A, STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
4/5 CAPER: Computerized assessment of psychosis riskR01MH120092 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
2/3 Community psychosis risk screening: An instrument development studyR01MH112545 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
High-Risk Psychosis Youth and Caregivers: Emotion in InteractionR21MH115231 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI HAASE, CLAUDIA, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2017 to 2018
$484k
Neural Habituation in Ultra High-Risk YouthR21MH110374 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2017 to 2018
$445k
Using Speech Acoustics to Reveal Motor Disruptions in PsychosisR21MH119677 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDRICK, MATTHEW A, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2019 to 2020
$424k
Neurocorrelates of alterations in facial expressivity in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosisF31MH121018 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, TINA · 2019 to 2021
$82k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH121018NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112545NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116039NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120092NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH110374NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH115231NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH119677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in facial expressions of emotion are a hallmark of psychopathology and may be present before the onset of mental illness. Technological advances have spurred interest in examining alterations based on "thin slices" of behavior using automated approaches. However, questions remain. First, can alterations be detected in ultrathin slices of behavior? Second, how do automated approaches converge with human coding techniques? The present study examined ultrathin (i.e., 1-min) slices of video-recorded clinical interviews of 42 individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis and 42 matched controls. Facial expressions of emotion (e.g., joy, anger) were examined using two automated facial analysis programs and coded by trained human raters (using the Expressive Emotional Behavior Coding System). Results showed that ultrathin (i.e., 1-min) slices of behavior were sufficient to reveal alterations in facial expressions of emotion, specifically blunted joy expressions in individuals at CHR (with supplementary analyses probing links with attenuated positive symptoms and functioning). Furthermore, both automated analysis programs converged in the ability to detect blunted joy expressions and were consistent with human coding at the level of both second-by-second and aggregate data. Finally, there were areas of divergence across approaches for other emotional expressions beyond joy. These data suggest that ultrathin slices of behavior can yield clues about emotional dysfunction. Further, automated approaches (which do not require lengthy training and coder time but do lend well to mobile assessment and computational modeling) show promise, but careful evaluation of convergence with human coding is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionPsychotic DisordersAngerEmotionsFaceHumans

Identifiers

PMID32584067
PMCPMC7759595
OpenAlexW3037670568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.