Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583884›Full record

ArticleCA: a cancer journal for clinicians2020

Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.

Samir Gupta, Gloria D Coronado, Keith Argenbright, Alison T Brenner, Sheila F Castañeda, Jason A Dominitz, Beverly Green, Rachel B Issaka, Theodore R Levin, Daniel S Reuland and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Behavioral Interventions Improve Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Overdue Patients in a Randomized Trial.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Video brochures in a mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach program provide cancer screening information in a user-friendly format for rural Appalachian community members.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Samir GuptaSection of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4192-5002
Gloria D CoronadoCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Keith ArgenbrightUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas.
Alison T BrennerDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Sheila F CastañedaDepartment of Psychology, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Jason A DominitzGastroenterology Section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Beverly GreenKaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Rachel B IssakaClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Theodore R LevinGastroenterology Department, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California.
Daniel S ReulandDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lisa C RichardsonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Douglas J RobertsonDepartment of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
Amit G SingalDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Michael PignoneDepartment of Internal Medicine and LiveStrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas.

Funding

Research Education CoreU54CA132384 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CRIPPS, RICHARD MATTHEW, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2022
$20.7M
Research Education CoreU54CA132379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARREDONDO, ELVA M, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2021
$16.1M
CRC-HUB-SPOKE: A ColoRectal Cancer screening Hub for Southern California community health centers.UH3CA233314 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GUPTA, SAMIR, HILL, LINDA L · 2020 to 2023
$4.9M
Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE): A State-Level Program to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Burden in Vulnerable PopulationsUH3CA233251 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REULAND, DANIEL S. · 2019 to 2023
$4.4M
Prediciting and addressing colonoscopy non-adherence in community settingsR01CA218923 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Post-polypectomy Surveillance for Reducing Colon Cancer Incidence and MortalityR37CA222866 · NCI · VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN/SAN DIEGO · PI GUPTA, SAMIR · 2018 to 2023
$3.3M
Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer PreventionU01MD010665 · NIMHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Developing an intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net population using a mixed methods approachK08CA241296 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ISSAKA, RACHEL B. · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE): A State-Level Program to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Burden in Vulnerable PopulationsUG3CA233251 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REULAND, DANIEL S. · 2018 to 2018
$763k
Screening More patients for CRC through Adapting and Refining Targeted Evidence-based Interventions in Rural settings (SMARTER CRC)UG3CA244298 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2019 to 2019
$644k
CRC-HUB-SPOKE: A ColoRectal Cancer screening Hub for Southern California community health centers.UG3CA233314 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CASTANEDA, SHEILA FAYE, GUPTA, SAMIR · 2019 to 2019
$604k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241296NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218923NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222866NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132379NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132384NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA233251NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA233314NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA244298NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA233251NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA233314NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD010665OSTLTS CDC HHS NU38OT000286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uptake of colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal. Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) offers promise for increasing screening rates, but optimal strategies for implementation have not been well synthesized. In June 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a meeting of subject matter experts and stakeholders to answer key questions regarding mailed FIT implementation in the United States. Points of agreement included: 1) primers, such as texts, telephone calls, and printed mailings before mailed FIT, appear to contribute to effectiveness; 2) invitation letters should be brief and easy to read, and the signatory should be tailored based on setting; 3) instructions for FIT completion should be simple and address challenges that may lead to failed laboratory processing, such as notation of collection date; 4) reminders delivered to initial noncompleters should be used to increase the FIT return rate; 5) data infrastructure should identify eligible patients and track each step in the outreach process, from primer delivery through abnormal FIT follow-up; 6) protocols and procedures such as navigation should be in place to promote colonoscopy after abnormal FIT; 7) a high-quality, 1-sample FIT should be used; 8) sustainability requires a program champion and organizational support for the work, including sufficient funding and external policies (such as quality reporting requirements) to drive commitment to program investment; and 9) the cost effectiveness of mailed FIT has been established. Participants concluded that mailed FIT is an effective and efficient strategy with great potential for increasing colorectal cancer screening in diverse health care settings if more widely implemented.

Indexed as

Occult BloodPostal ServiceCause of DeathCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Colorectal NeoplasmsCongresses as TopicEarly Detection of CancerHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicReminder SystemsUnited Statescolorectal cancer (CRC)colorectal neoplasmsevidence basedfecal immunochemical test (FIT)mailed outreach

Identifiers

PMID32583884
PMCPMC7523556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.