Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583568›Full record

ArticleJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2020

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in clinical practice: A survey among Dutch neurologists.

Merel C Broers, Pieter A van Doorn, Krista Kuitwaard, Filip Eftimov, Paul W Wirtz, Stephan Goedee, Hester F Lingsma, Bart C Jacobs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Merel C BroersDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7770-8475
Pieter A van DoornDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Krista KuitwaardDepartment of Neurology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Filip EftimovDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul W WirtzDepartment of Neurology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Stephan GoedeeDepartment of Neurology, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart C JacobsDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLHaga Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is often a challenge. The clinical presentation is diverse, accurate biomarkers are lacking, and the best strategy to initiate and maintain treatment is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine how neurologists diagnose and treat CIDP. We conducted a cross-sectional survey on diagnostic and treatment practices among Dutch neurologists involved in the clinical care of CIDP patients. Forty-four neurologists completed the survey (44/71; 62%). The respondents indicated to use the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 CIDP guideline for the diagnosis in 77% and for treatment in 50%. Only 57% of respondents indicated that the presence of demyelinating electrophysiological findings was mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of CIDP. Most neurologists used intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) as first choice treatment, but the indications to start, optimize, or withdraw IVIg, and the use of other immune-modulatory therapies varied. University-affiliated respondents used the EFNS/PNS 2010 diagnostic criteria, nerve imaging tools, and immunosuppressive drugs more often. Despite the existence of an international guideline, there is considerable variation among neurologists in the strategies employed to diagnose and treat CIDP. More specific recommendations regarding: (a) the minimal set of electrophysiological requirements to diagnose CIDP, (b) the possible added value of nerve imaging, especially in patients not meeting the electrodiagnostic criteria, (c) the most relevant serological examinations, and (d) the clear treatment advice, in the new EFNS/PNS guideline, would likely support its implementation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectrodiagnosisHealth Care SurveysHumansImmunologic FactorsMiddle AgedNetherlandsNeurologistsPolyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory DemyelinatingPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Immunologic Factorschronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathycorticosteroidguidelineimmunoglobulinsurvey

Identifiers

PMID32583568
PMCPMC7497090
OpenAlexW3037894533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.