ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2020
Characterization of T-DM1-resistant breast cancer cells.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D bioprinting for cancer modeling and drug screening.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Drug resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- HER2 Antibody-Nanogel Conjugates: A High-Capacity, Antibody-Sparing Alternative to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Nano letters · 2026Article
- Targeting Cytoskeleton and Cell Motility: Past and Novel Strategies for Cancer Therapy.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of resistance to antibody-drug conjugates in bladder cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Emerging Targeted and Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Elacridar Reverses P-gp-Mediated Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Cells in 2D and 3D Culture Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates come of age in oncology.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023Review
- Manufacture and evaluation of a HER2-positive breast cancer immunotoxin 4D5Fv-PE25.Microbial cell factories · 2023Article
- Resistance to antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: mechanisms and solutions.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2023Review
- Development of a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Whole-Body Disposition of MMAE Containing Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Mice.Pharmaceutical research · 2022Article
- Review
- Generation of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Resistant Models.Cancers · 2021Review
- Exatecan Antibody Drug Conjugates Based on a Hydrophilic Polysarcosine Drug-Linker Platform.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Characterization of T-DM1-resistant breast cancer cells.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of targeted therapies has drastically improved the outcome of patients with different types of cancer. T-DM1 (trastuzumab-emtansine) is an antibody-drug conjugate used for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer combining the FDA approved mAb (monoclonal antibody) trastuzumab and the microtubule cytotoxic agent DM1 (emtansine). Despite clinical successes achieved by targeted therapies, a large number of patients develop resistance during treatment. To explore mechanisms of resistance to T-DM1, the MDA-MB-361 HER2-positive breast cancer cell line was exposed in vitro to T-DM1 in the absence or presence of ciclosporin A. Previously reported mechanisms of resistance such as trastuzumab-binding alterations, MDR1 upregulation, and SLC46A3 downregulation were not observed in these models. Despite a decrease in HER2 expression at the cell surface, both resistant cell lines remained sensitive to HER2 targeted therapies such as mAbs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In addition, sensitivity to DNA damaging agents and topoisomerase inhibitors were unchanged. Conversely resistance to anti-tubulin agents increased. Resistant cells displayed a decreased content of polymerized tubulin and a decreased content of βIII tubulin although the downregulation of βIII tubulin by siRNA in the parental cell line did not modified the sensitivity to T-DM1. Both cell lines resistant to T-DM1 also presented giant aneuploid cells. Several SLC (solute carrier) transporters were found to be differentially expressed in the resistant cells in comparison to parental cells. These results suggest that some characteristics such as increased baseline aneuploidy and altered intracellular drug trafficking might be involved in resistance to T-DM1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.