Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583358›Full record

SynthesisJournal of community health2021

Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.

Siddhartha Roy, Sabrina Dickey, Hsiao-Lan Wang, Alexandria Washington, Randy Polo, Clement K Gwede, John S Luque

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05903885 (Using a Cross-sectional Partnership to Improve Prevention and Health Equity Among African Americans), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05903885 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Using a Cross-sectional Partnership to Improve Prevention and Health Equity Among African Americans

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled1,200ConditionsColorectal Cancer, PreventionArmsOn-site Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Kit Distribution, On-site With Social Media Advertising Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Kit Distribution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions to Reduce Risk Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer in High-Risk Groups: a Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Leveraging Multi-Sectoral Partnership for Colorectal Cancer Education and Screening in the African American Community: A Protocol and Preliminary Results.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Barriers and Facilitators to Stool-Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer Among Black Louisville Residents.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Siddhartha RoyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State University Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Sabrina DickeyCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Hsiao-Lan WangCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Alexandria WashingtonCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1415 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA.
Randy PoloUniversity Libraries, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Clement K GwedeDivision of Population Sciences, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
John S LuqueCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1415 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA. john.luque@famu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8085-4641
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University · USUniversity of South Florida · USFlorida State University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Research Project-3: Effectiveness of an eHealth intervention for uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic womenU54MD007582 · NIMHD · FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIV · PI Eunsook Yu Lee · 2019 to 2026
$28.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African Americans experience colorectal cancer (CRC) related disparities compared to other racial groups in the United States. African Americans are frequently diagnosed with CRC at a later stage, screening is underutilized, and mortality rates are highest in this group. This systematic review focused on intervention studies using stool blood CRC screening among African Americans in primary care and community settings. Given wide accessibility, low cost, and ease of dissemination of stool-based CRC screening tests, this review aims to determine effective interventions to improve participation rates. This systematic review included intervention studies published between January 1, 2000 and March 16, 2019. After reviewing an initial search of 650 studies, 11 studies were eventually included in this review. The included studies were studies conducted in community and clinical settings, using both inreach and outreach strategies to increase CRC screening. For each study, an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for the CRC screening intervention compared to the control arm was calculated based on the data in each study to report effectiveness. The eleven studies together recruited a total of 3334 participants. The five studies using two-arm experimental designs ranged in effectiveness with ORs ranging from 1.1 to 13.0 using interventions such as mailed reminders, patient navigation, and tailored educational materials. Effective strategies to increase stool blood testing included mailed stool blood tests augmented by patient navigation, tailored educational materials, and follow-up calls or mailings to increase trust in the patient-provider relationship. More studies are needed on stool blood testing interventions to determine effectiveness in this population.

Indexed as

Occult BloodBlack or African AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient NavigationPostal ServicePrimary Health CareUnited StatesAfrican AmericansCancer screeningColonoscopyColorectal cancerStool blood tests

Identifiers

PMID32583358
PMCPMC7313439
OpenAlexW3037165287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.