Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583330›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020

Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Guilherme Nader Marta, Pedro Isaacsson Velho, Renata R C Bonadio, Mirella Nardo, Sheila F Faraj, Manoel Carlos L de Azevedo Souza, David Q B Muniz, Diogo Assed Bastos, Carlos Dzik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guilherme Nader MartaInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil. guilherme.marta@usp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-3637
Pedro Isaacsson VelhoJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Renata R C BonadioInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
Mirella NardoInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
Sheila F FarajInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
Manoel Carlos L de Azevedo SouzaInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
David Q B MunizInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
Diogo Assed BastosInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
Carlos DzikInstituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil.
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) encompasses a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with distinct clinical behavior and prognoses. As a result of the increasing number of therapeutic options in the metastatic setting, it is crucial to improve prognostic stratification ability. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and combination platelet count and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (COP-NLR) in patients with mRCC. We evaluated a cohort of mRCC patients treated with first-line pazopanib or sunitinib. Levels of NLR, PLR and COP-NLR were measured prior to systemic treatment and evaluated as prognostic predictors. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Data from 276 patients were included, of which 54.7% received first-line pazopanib and 45.3%, sunitinib. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk classification was intermediate and poor in 50% and 42.6% of patients, respectively. High NLR (> 3.5) was associated with inferior OS (median 9.6 vs 17.8 months, P < 0.001). A high PLR (> 200) was associated with inferior OS (median 10.3 vs 17 months, P = 0.002). The median OS in the COP-NLR 1, 2 and 3 groups were 19.0 months (95% CI 15.3-26.0), 13.1 months (95% CI 9.8-17.0) and 7.4 months (95% CI 3.6-11.9), respectively (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, high NLR and high COP-NLR were associated with inferior OS. Both high NLR and high COP-NLR were associated with poorer OS in our cohort of patients with mRCC treated with first-line pazopanib or sunitinib.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellChildFemaleHumansIndazolesInflammationKidney NeoplasmsLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorIndazolespazopanibPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPazopanibPlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratioRenal cell carcinomaSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID32583330
OpenAlexW3038083882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.