ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Identification of Hydrogen Gas Producing Anaerobic Bacteria Isolated from Sago Industrial Effluent.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiomes of biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of industrial wastes: current trends, advanced tools and future outlook.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2022Review
- Variation of the Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Communities After Distinct Methods of Thermal Pretreatment of the Inoculum in Hydrogen-Production Reactors from Sugarcane Vinasse.Current microbiology · 2021Article
- Isolation, identification, and biological characteristics of Clostridium sartagoforme from rabbit.PloS one · 2021Article
- The adherence-associated Fdp fasciclin I domain protein of the biohydrogen producerInternational journal of hydrogen energy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the biohydrogen production ability of isolated strains with sago industrial effluent in anaerobic batch fermentation was investigated. The bacteria responsible for the biohydrogen were isolated and identified as Clostridium sartagoforme NASGE 01 and Enterobacter cloacae NASGE 02. The volume of biohydrogen gas generated from the effluent was determined by gas chromatography (GC) and the organic acids formed during the biohydrogen production were determined by GC equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID). In batch fermentation, C. sartagoforme NASGE 01 produced high amount of biogas (232 ± 11.02 mL/L) and biohydrogen (41.5%) followed by E. cloacae NASGE 02 produced 212.8 ± 8 mL/L biogas containing 31.5% of biohydrogen. Moreover, the hydrogen production potential (P), production rate (Rm) and lag time (λ) were analyzed from Gompertz non-linear curve fit model. The peak hydrogen yield was obtained with C. sartagoforme NASGE 01 was 158.7 mL/g glucose (1.26 mol H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.