Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583135›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2020

CRISPR-Cas9/CRISPRi tools for cell factory construction in E. coli.

Atieh Hashemi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9-induced gene editing system forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Balancing Cell Growth and Product Synthesis for Efficient Microbial Cell Factories.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Haploid Production inBiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. ModifyingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Atieh HashemiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 2660, Vali-e-Asr Ave, Tehran, Iran. at_hashemi@sbmu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7121-5306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The innovative CRISPR-Cas based genome editing technology provides some functionality and advantages such as the high efficiency and specificity as well as ease of handling. Both aspects of the CRISPR-Cas9 system including genetic engineering and gene regulation are advantageously applicable to the construction of microbial cell factories. As one of the most extensively used cell factories, E. coli has been engineered to produce various high value-added chemical compounds such as pharmaceuticals, biochemicals, and biofuels. Therefore, to improve the production of valuable metabolites, many investigations have been performed by focusing on CRISPR-Cas- based metabolic engineering of this host. In the current review, the biology underlying CRISPR-Cas9 system was briefly explained and then the applications of CRISPR-Cas9/CRISPRi tools were considered for cell factory construction in E. coli.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsComputational BiologyEscherichia coliGene EditingMetabolic EngineeringCRISPR–Cas9 systemCRISPRiE. coliGenome editingMetabolic engineering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.