Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583131›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2021

Novel Potential Probiotic Lactobacilli for Prevention and Treatment of Vulvovaginal Infections.

Monika Kumherová, Kristina Veselá, Michaela Kosová, Jaromír Mašata, Šárka Horáčková, Jan Šmidrkal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Interplay betweenMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Isolation and Identification ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Use of probiotic lactobacilli in the treatment of vaginal infections:Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika KumherováDepartment of Dairy, Fat and Cosmetics, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic. monika.kumherova@vscht.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-4822-5597
Kristina VeseláDepartment of Dairy, Fat and Cosmetics, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Michaela KosováDepartment of Dairy, Fat and Cosmetics, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Jaromír MašataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Apolinářská 18, 128 51, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Šárka HoráčkováDepartment of Dairy, Fat and Cosmetics, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Jan ŠmidrkalDepartment of Dairy, Fat and Cosmetics, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 166 28, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacilli in the vaginal tract are essential to protect against microbial infections. We therefore focused on isolating vaginal lactobacilli from pregnant women and testing their functional properties. Lactobacilli were isolated from 50 vaginal swabs and the purified isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Functional properties (antimicrobial activity, organic acids and hydrogen peroxide production, antibiotic susceptibility, auto-aggregation, and hydrophobicity) of selected isolates were tested. Lactobacilli (41 strains) were identified in 58% of swabs with a predominance of Lactobacillus crispatus (48%) followed by L. jensenii (21%), L. rhamnosus (14%), L. fermentum (10%), and L. gasseri (7%). The highest antibacterial activity was determined for L. fermentum and L. rhamnosus. Strong anti-Candida activity was observed for strains L. crispatus, L. fermentum, and L. rhamnosus. Strain L. jensenii 58C possessed the highest production of hydrogen peroxide (6.32 ± 0.60 mg/l). The best lactic acid producer was strain L. rhamnosus 72A (11.6 ± 0.2 g/l). All strains were resistant to fluconazole and metronidazole. The highest auto-aggregation was observed for strain L. crispatus 51A (98.8 ± 0.1% after 24 h). Strain L. rhamnosus 68A showed the highest hydrophobicity (69.1 ± 1.4%). Strains L. fermentum and L. rhamnosus showed high antibacterial activity and hydrophobicity, and strains L. crispatus possessed high auto-aggregation and anti-Candida activity. Thus, these strains alone or in a mix could be used for the preparation of probiotic products for treatment and prevention of vulvovaginal infections of pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Indexed as

CandidiasisLactobacillusVaginitisVulvitisAdultCandidaFemaleHumansPregnancyVaginaLactobacilliProbioticsVaginal microbiomeVulvovaginal infections

Identifiers

PMID32583131
OpenAlexW3037865673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.