ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2020
[The Early Mobilization Network].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Intensive care of patients with [infarct-related] cardiogenic shock : Abridged version of the S1 guideline].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Guideline
- [Core curriculum of intensive care and emergency medicine in internal medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- [Core curriculum Medical intensive care medicine of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN)].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince its foundation in 2011, the German Network for Early Mobilization of mechanically ventilated intensive care patients delivered, among others, more than 90 monthly newsletters, 14 research projects, and 3 national conferences. PURPOSE: The aim of this online survey was to evaluate whether members of the Network perceived a professional benefit for themselves and their intensive cate units (ICU).
methodsAn interprofessional online survey of 303 clinicians of the Network in German speaking countries in July 2019 was undertaken. The survey included questions about newsletters, personal benefits, perceived improvements on their workplaces, and future expectations.
resultsThe response rate was 48% (n = 145), mainly nurses and physiotherapists. The majority perceived the newsletter as good. Members reported that the network extended their professional knowledge and improved the quality of the ICUs regarding early mobilization, delirium management, and interprofessional goals. Participants expressed a wish for more workshops, case reports, webinars, and other educational possibilities.
conclusionsMembers of the network Early Mobilization perceived a personal and professional benefit. The network supported quality improvements projects in ICUs. The progress of the network may serve as an example for development of other professional networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.