Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583025›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2020

[Robotic assistance systems for surgery : Current developments and focus of research].

Julian Klodmann, Christopher Schlenk, Szilvia Borsdorf, Roland Unterhinninghofen, Alin Albu-Schäffer, Gerd Hirzinger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Robotics and intraoperative navigation].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian KlodmannInstitut für Robotik und Mechatronik, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Münchener Str. 20, 82234, Weßling, Deutschland. julian.klodmann@dlr.de.
Christopher SchlenkInstitut für Robotik und Mechatronik, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Münchener Str. 20, 82234, Weßling, Deutschland.
Szilvia BorsdorfInstitut für Robotik und Mechatronik, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Münchener Str. 20, 82234, Weßling, Deutschland.
Roland UnterhinninghofenInstitut für Robotik und Mechatronik, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Münchener Str. 20, 82234, Weßling, Deutschland.
Alin Albu-SchäfferInstitut für Robotik und Mechatronik, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Münchener Str. 20, 82234, Weßling, Deutschland.
Gerd HirzingerInstitut für Robotik und Mechatronik, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Münchener Str. 20, 82234, Weßling, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As robotic systems are now technically mature and widely available, they also play an increasingly important role in the clinical environment. Thus, numerous robotic assistance systems for diagnosis and therapy have shown their potential for supporting patient care. After a brief review of the history, this article describes currently available robotic assistance systems for surgery, especially those originating in Germany and Europe as well as current focal topics of research. In addition, challenges in this field as well as possibilities for close active and interdisciplinary cooperation between stakeholders from hospitals, industry and science to overcome such challenges are presented.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresEuropeGermanyHumansAssistance SystemsLaparoscopyNeurosurgeryOrthopedicsRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.