ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021
Efficacy of delayed
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nuclear imaging for localization and surgical outcome prediction in epilepsy: A review of latest discoveries and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Head-to-Head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Hybrid PET/MRI Imaging of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose and 18-kDa Translocator Protein for Presurgical Localization in Refractory Epilepsy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- DelayedFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Morphometric analysis program and quantitative positron emission tomography in presurgical localization in MRI-negative epilepsies: a simultaneous PET/MRI study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe sought to investigate the contribution of delayed
methodsForty-one patients with epilepsy underwent a brain dual time point
resultsThe AI at the delayed time points was increased by a mean of 3.7 over the early time point in all patients (P < 0.01). The biggest AIs were found in the MRI-positive group. The ΔAI between two imaging points were 3.71 ± 3.50 and 4.67 ± 7.94 for MRI-positive and MRI-negative; 4.52 ± 6.70 and 2.51 ± 2.42 for extra-TLE and TLE; and 4.24 ± 6.52 and 3.46 ± 2.90 for short delay and long delay groups, respectively. There were more patients with increased AI at the delayed time with MRI-positive (95.8%, 23/24), with extra-TLE (96.8%, 30/31), and with short delay time (93.7%, 30/32). Two observers who had no knowledge of the images chose 85.4% and 82.9% of the delay-time point images as the more obvious asymmetry from all images. The kappa value between the two observers was 0.66 with good agreement.
conclusionDelayed
Indexed as
Identifiers
32583012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.