ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021
Is the fixation of single incision TVT-S tape as good as that of transobturator tape? An ultrasound study of randomized trial results.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Could infiltration anesthesia decrease anchor-fixation quality of midurethral slings in the obturator complex?International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTVT-Secur (TVT-S) was the first single-incision sling available on the market and was soon found to have less efficacy than mid-urethral slings. Our aim was to assess the position and tape descent following TVT-O and TVT-S H in a U procedure and, based on this evaluation, to find the possible reason for lower TVT-S surgery efficacy.
methodsWe conducted an ultrasound study of a randomised trial with a 3-year follow-up that took place between 2007 and 2009 and included 197 women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Of these, 67 were allocated to receive the TVT-O procedure, 64 to TVT-S in the H position, and 65 in the U position. Patients underwent a complete urogynaecological and ultrasound examination. The positions of the bladder neck and the tape after surgery were assessed and the data obtained compared between groups.
resultsOur primary study showed a significantly higher rate of positive stress tests in the TVT-S groups compared to the TVT-O group. After surgery, there was no difference between the position of the tape at rest and at maximal Valsalva between the groups. In TVT-O patients, the mean length of the upper tape margin descent increased from 6 mm on the 1st day after surgery to 9 mm 3 months after surgery and remained stable afterwards. For TVT-S patients, there was a further increase of up to 15 mm in tape descent after 3 months.
conclusionsOur results show that the lower efficacy of TVT-S might be due to inadequate fixation and increasing tape descent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32583011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.