ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2020
Incidental finding of adenocarcinoma in a gallbladder lumen with no wall involvement.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare disease characterized by its aggressiveness. Resection with free tumour margins is the sole curative treatment and, in incidental findings, surgical reapproach is recommended for segmentectomy IVb and V or wedge resection of the gallbladder fossa and lymphadenectomy. Here we report a case of gallbladder adenocarcinoma as an incidental finding in a fragment in its lumen with no wall involvement evidentiated. The patient was reoperated for resection of the gallbladder bed with hepatic hilum and cystic duct lymphadenectomy, later evidentiated as free of residual disease. The normality of the bile ducts evidenced by imaging studies, in addition to signs of chronic cholecystitis corroborate to GBC diagnosis. We suspect that the fragment was detached gallbladder polypoid neoplastic lesion. Despite the lack of clinical manifestations, the fast surgical interventions and the histopathological analysis of the material was probably a prognostic determinant for the patient.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.