Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32582268›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Plant Root-Exudates Recruit Hyperparasitic Bacteria of Phytonematodes by Altered Cuticle Aging: Implications for Biological Control Strategies.

Sharad Mohan, K Kiran Kumar, Vivek Sutar, Supradip Saha, Janet Rowe, Keith G Davies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exploring the mechanisms of host-specificity of a hyperparasitic bacterium (Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Analysis of the response mechanisms ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sharad MohanDivision of Nematology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
K Kiran KumarIndian Council of Agricultural Research, Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur, India.
Vivek SutarDivision of Nematology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Supradip SahaDivision of Agricultural Chemicals, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Janet RowePlant Pathology and Microbiology, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Keith G DaviesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INCentral Citrus Research Institute · INNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NORothamsted Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytonematodes are globally important functional components of the belowground ecology in both natural and agricultural soils; they are a diverse group of which some species are economically important pests, and environmentally benign control strategies are being sought to control them. Using eco-evolutionary theory, we test the hypothesis that root-exudates of host plants will increase the ability of a hyperparasitic bacteria,

Indexed as

co-evolutionendospore adhesionHeteroderahost-parasite interactionMeloidogynePasteuriaRed Queen dynamics

Identifiers

PMID32582268
PMCPMC7296116
OpenAlexW3033140084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.