ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Trends and Collaborative Patterns inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Wolbachia in Tephritid Populations from Argentina: New Hosts and First Report of Multiple Infections in Rhagoletotrypeta pastranai.Neotropical entomology · 2026Article
- Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the South American fruit fly, Anastrepha fraterculus sp.1.Insect science · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevalence of Wolbachia infection in field natural population of the apricot seed wasp Eurytoma samsonowi (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae).International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Incidence of endosymbiont bacteria Wolbachia in cowpea weevil Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae).PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Genomic Assessment of the Contribution of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Characterization of the Bacterial Microbiome in Natural Populations of Barley Stem Gall Midge,Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Fruit Fly Larval Survival in Picked and Unpicked Tomato Fruit of Differing Ripeness and Associated Gene Expression Patterns.Insects · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Gut Bacterial Community of Wild Larvae ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Bitter friends are not always toxic: The loss of acetic acid bacteria and the absence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- High Incidence of RelatedInsects · 2021Article
- Isolation and characterization of a novel bacteriophage WO from Allonemobius socius crickets in Missouri.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Transinfection of buffalo flies (Haematobia irritans exigua) with Wolbachia and effect on host biology.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Members of the true fruit flies (family Tephritidae) are among the most serious agricultural pests worldwide, whose control and management demands large and costly international efforts. The need for cost-effective and environmentally friendly integrated pest management (IPM) has led to the development and implementation of autocidal control strategies. These approaches include the widely used sterile insect technique and the incompatible insect technique (IIT). IIT relies on maternally transmitted bacteria (namely
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.