ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2020
Using the Delphi Method to Identify Risk Factors Contributing to Adverse Events in Residential Aged Care Facilities.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an Evaluation Framework for the Integration of Clinical and Preventive Medicine in Traditional Chinese Medicine: Using a DELPHI-AHP Approach.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- An integrated hybrid HAZOP and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process framework for enhanced safety risk prioritization in process industries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application and Delphi Validation of an Omaha System-Based Evaluation Index for Post-PCI Rehabilitation Nursing.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Measuring the care risk in older adults with dementia: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Research on the construction of a Chinese indicator system for college students' multidimensional health.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Construction of a performance evaluation index system for the management of chronic diseases based on medical and preventive integration.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Introducing FMEA plus method for comprehensive safety risk assessment in the steel industry.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and Preliminary Validation of the Chinese Version of the Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Self-Management Behavior Scale (CPTSMBS) for Patients with Cancer.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Building bridges of excellence: a comprehensive competence framework for nurses in hospice and palliative care-a mixed method study.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Constructing an emergency preparedness evaluation index system for public use during major emerging infectious disease outbreaks: a Delphi study.BMC public health · 2023Review
- An evidence-based general anaesthesia and prone position nursing checklist: Development and testing.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Determining a common understanding of interprofessional competencies for pre-registration health professionals in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Delphi study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- An evaluation index system for regional mobile SARS-CoV-2 virus nucleic acid testing capacity in China: a modified Delphi consensus study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Adverse Events and Risk Management in Residential Aged Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hunan, China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- Perceptions and experiences of risk management by managers of residential aged care facilities: a qualitative study from Hunan Province, China.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021Article
- A Scoping Review of Adverse Incidents Research in Aged Care Homes: Learnings, Gaps, and Challenges.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to identify risk factors associated with adverse events in residential aged care facilities in China. PATIENTS AND
methodsAfter compiling a list of risk factors for adverse events generated from in-depth interviews with managers of residential aged care facilities, a three-round Delphi method was used to reach consensus. The synthesized risk factors were presented on a Likert scale to the expert panelists three times to validate their responses.
resultsThe list identified 67 items as risk factors for adverse events, attached to four first-level indexes (ie, environmental facility, nursing staff, older adults' characteristics, and management factors). The experts' authority coefficient was 0.87. The positive coefficients were 82.76%, 91.67%, and 100%, and the coordination coefficients were 0.154, 0.297, and 0.313 in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively.
conclusionUsing a Delphi method, this study established a consensus on risk factors contributing to adverse events and developed a risk assessment grade for use in future aged care practice and research. The resulting list is useful in prioritizing risk-reduction activities and assessing intervention or education strategies for preventing adverse events in residential aged care facilities. IMPACT: This study fills the gap in risk identification in the Chinese residential aged care system to ensure provision of best-practice care to this vulnerable population. Nursing staff and management factors at the top of the list are not only the most common causes of adverse events but also the core elements in creating a secure and error-free environment. This list was intended to support predictive and prevention-oriented decision-making by managers and nursing supervisors to reduce preventable adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.