Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32581504›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Self-Retained Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane for the Management of Corneal Ulcers.

Daniel Brocks, Olivia G Mead, Sean Tighe, Scheffer C G Tseng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Amniotic membrane transplantation for neurotrophic corneal ulcers.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Letter to the editor: PROKERATaiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel BrocksBostonSight, Needham, MA, USA.
Olivia G MeadOcular Surface Center and TissueTech Inc, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0788-4374
Sean TigheDepartment of Ophthalmology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Scheffer C G TsengOcular Surface Center and TissueTech Inc, Miami, FL, USA.
Ocular Surface Center · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of self-retained cryopreserved amniotic membrane (cAM) for the treatment of corneal ulcers.

methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients with non-healing corneal ulcers that underwent treatment with self-retained cAM (PROKERA

resultsA total of 13 eyes (13 patients) with recalcitrant corneal ulcers were included for analysis, 9 (69%) of which progressed from neurotrophic keratitis (NK). Prior to cAM application, patients used conventional treatments such as artificial tears (n = 11), antibiotics (n = 11), ointment (n = 11), steroids (n = 6), and antivirals (n = 3). Self-retained cAMs (n = 1.5 ± 0.8) were placed for 6.8 ± 3.4 days, during which time antibiotics were continued. Four cases (31%) were subsequently treated with bandage contact lens (n = 3) and tarsorrhaphy (n = 1). All corneal ulcers healed in a median of 14 days (range: 4-43). This was accompanied by a significant improvement in ocular discomfort, corneal staining, and corneal signs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (

conclusionSelf-retained cAM may be a valuable, in-office treatment option for healing recalcitrant corneal ulcers of various etiologies, especially those with underlying NK. Further prospective, controlled studies are warranted.

Indexed as

amniotic membranecorneal ulcerneurotrophic keratitisocular surface disease

Identifiers

PMID32581504
PMCPMC7266945
OpenAlexW3027541023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.