Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32581367›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Associations of non-pedunculated T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma outcome with consensus molecular subtypes, immunoscore, and microsatellite status: a multicenter case-cohort study.

Krijn J C Haasnoot, Yara Backes, Leon M G Moons, Onno Kranenburg, Anne Trinh, Louis Vermeulen, Michaël Noë, Jurriaan B Tuynman, Anja U G van Lent, Rosaline van Ginneken and 23 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. CINSARC signature outperforms gold-standard TNM staging and consensus molecular subtypes for clinical outcome in stage II-III colorectal carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Krijn J C Haasnoot *Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-7906
Yara Backes *Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6942-3501
Leon M G MoonsDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Onno KranenburgDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anne TrinhMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Louis VermeulenLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6066-789X
Michaël NoëDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5336-4508
Jurriaan B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anja U G van LentDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rosaline van GinnekenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cornelis A SeldenrijkPathology DNA, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Mihaela G RaicuPathology DNA, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Kari TrumpiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Inge UbinkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anya N MilnePathology DNA, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Jurjen J BoonstraDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
John N GroenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, the Netherlands.
Matthijs P SchwartzDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Frank H J WolfhagenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Joost M J GeesingDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Frank Ter BorgDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Lodewijk A A BrosensDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-8994
Jeroen van BergeijkDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands.
Bernhard W M SpanierDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen CappelDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Koen KesselsDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-4137
Tom C J SeerdenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Frank P VleggaarDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
G Johan A OfferhausDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd G EliasJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Miangela M LacléDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. M.M.Lacle@umcutrecht.nl.
Dutch T1 CRC Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) or CRC with a low immunoscore is associated with shorter survival times. Non-metastatic CRC with microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with a lower risk of recurrence. We evaluated outcome (lymph node metastases [LNM] or cancer recurrence) in these tumor subtypes in patients with surgically-removed non-pedunculated T1 CRC by performing a multicenter case-cohort study. We included all patients in 13 hospitals in the Netherlands from 2000-2014 (n = 651). We randomly selected a subgroup of patients (n = 223) and all patients with LNM or recurrence (n = 63), and median follow-up of 44 months. We centrally reviewed tumor-slides, and constructed and immunostained tissue microarrays determining MSI, CMS (MSI/CMS1, CMS2/3, or CMS4), and immunoscore (I-low/I-high). We used weighted Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the association of MSI, CMS, and immunoscore with LNM or recurrence, adjusting for conventional histologic risk factors. In the randomly selected subgroup of patients, 7.1% of tumors were MSI/CMS1, 91.0% CMS2/3, 1.8% CMS4, and 25% I-low. In the case-cohort, patients with CMS4 tumors had an increased risk for LNM or recurrence compared with patients with tumors of other CMSs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.97; 95% CI, 1.12-14.06; P = 0.03). Albeit not significant, tumors with MSI had a lower risk for LNM or recurrence than other tumor subtypes (adjusted HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.12-2.30; P = 0.39), whereas tumors with a low immunoscore had an increased risk for LNM or recurrence (adjusted HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.68-2.48; P = 0.43). In conclusion, in a case-cohort study of patients with non-pedunculated T1 CRC, MSI, and immunoscore were not significantly associated with adverse outcome after surgery. CMS4 substantially increased the risk of adverse outcome. However, CMS4 is rare in T1 CRCs, limiting its value for determining the risk in patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColorectal NeoplasmsImmunohistochemistryMicrosatellite InstabilityAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsBiomarkers, TumorDNA Repair Enzymes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.