Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32581299›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2020

Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition.

Katrine Bach Habersaat, Cornelia Betsch, Margie Danchin, Cass R Sunstein, Robert Böhm, Armin Falk, Noel T Brewer, Saad B Omer, Martha Scherzer, Sunita Sah and 22 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effectiveness of communications in enhancing adherence to public health behavioural interventions: a COVID-19 evidence review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Katrine Bach Habersaat *WHO Regional Office for Europe, Insights Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark. habersaatk@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5499-2805
Cornelia Betsch *Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-7303
Margie DanchinThe University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-5691
Cass R SunsteinHarvard University, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-3008
Robert BöhmDepartment of Psychology, Department of Economics, and Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6806-0374
Armin FalkUniversity of Bonn and Institute on Behavior and Inequality (BRIQ), Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-3002
Noel T BrewerDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Saad B OmerYale Institute for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Nursing, New Haven, CT, USA.
Martha ScherzerWHO Regional Office for Europe, Insights Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sunita SahCambridge Judge Business School, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-4414
Edward F FischerDepartment of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7272-9832
Andrea E ScheelWHO Regional Office for Europe, Insights Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7176-1697
Daisy FancourtDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Shinobu KitayamaDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-7936
Eve DubéDépartement d'Anthropologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Julie LeaskFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-1443
Mohan DuttaCenter for Culture-Centered Approach to Research and Evaluation (CARE), Massey University, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Noni E MacDonaldDepartment of Paediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Anna TemkinaDepartment of Sociology, European University of St. Petersburg, St, Petersburg, Russia.
Andreas LieberothDanish School of Education, Interacting Minds Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-5791
Mark JacksonWellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health and WHO Collaborating Centre on Culture and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3248-2636
Stephan LewandowskySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1655-2013
Holly SealeSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-5395
Nils FietjeWHO Regional Office for Europe, Insights Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philipp SchmidDepartment of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-0806
Michele GelfandDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-9230
Lars KornCenter for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Sarah EitzeCenter for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Lisa FelgendreffCenter for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-8061
Philipp SprengholzCenter for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9925-1920
Cristiana SalviWHO Regional Office for Europe, Insights Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robb ButlerWHO Regional Office for Europe, Insights Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205407/Z/16/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Governments around the world have implemented measures to manage the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While the majority of these measures are proving effective, they have a high social and economic cost, and response strategies are being adjusted. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that communities should have a voice, be informed and engaged, and participate in this transition phase. We propose ten considerations to support this principle: (1) implement a phased approach to a 'new normal'; (2) balance individual rights with the social good; (3) prioritise people at highest risk of negative consequences; (4) provide special support for healthcare workers and care staff; (5) build, strengthen and maintain trust; (6) enlist existing social norms and foster healthy new norms; (7) increase resilience and self-efficacy; (8) use clear and positive language; (9) anticipate and manage misinformation; and (10) engage with media outlets. The transition phase should also be informed by real-time data according to which governmental responses should be updated.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationGovernmentPublic PolicyBetacoronavirusCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicationCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Health PersonnelHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Self EfficacySocial NormsSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID32581299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.