ArticleScientific reports2020
Clinical characteristics of branch retinal vein occlusion with increased retinal haemorrhage during treatment for macular oedema.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual Prognostic Factors in Eyes with Subretinal Fluid Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Microvascular and functional changes according to the fundus location of the affected arteriovenous crossing in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate clinical characteristics of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) patients with increased retinal haemorrhage during macular oedema (MO) treatment. Patients were divided into increased and non-increased retinal haemorrhage groups. The former group was sub-divided based on the degree of increase: < 50% or ≥ 50%. Baseline characteristics, clinical data, and best vision achieved before and after increased retinal haemorrhage were assessed. Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients were included. Forty-six eyes were non-increased, 11 eyes experienced < 50% increase in retinal haemorrhage, and 11 eyes had ≥ 50% increase. Ischaemic BRVO was related to increased haemorrhage based on the multivariate analysis. The ≥ 50% increase group exhibited higher baseline central subfield macular thickness (CSMT), poorer baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and longer mean periods between the final intravitreal injections and the time increased retinal haemorrhages were observed, compared to the < 50% group. The best vision achieved before and after increased haemorrhage was significantly worse in the ≥ 50% group. In conclusion, the ischaemic type of BRVO is related to increased retinal haemorrhage during MO treatment, and a ≥ 50% increase in haemorrhages is associated with higher CSMT and poorer BCVA at baseline, with poor visual gain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.