ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2020
[Ethical, legal and social issues publications on biobanks 2011-2018. A scoping review.]
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contested futures of AI ethics for global population health.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
- Ethical Issues in Genetics and Infectious Diseases Research: An Interdisciplinary Expert Review.Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman-based biobanks have been presented as intermediary agents between donors/participants, the scientific community, the healthcare system, and patients. The objective of this systematic review was to contribute with an updated thematic synthesis in Spanish of the international literature (2011-2018) regarding ethical, legal, and social issues on contemporary biobanks.
methodsA scoping review and thematic analysis were carried out on biobanks' ethical, legal, and social issues. The following databases were searched: Web of Science, SciELO, and Dialnet. The review included 2011-2018 publications with the term "biobank" or "biobanco" in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French.
resultsA total of 153 publications were analyzed. The most published themes were: informed consent, biobanks as a scientific tool, other ethical issues, public engagement, and regulation. While documents published in English provide studies with a broader anthropologic approach and display the participatory turn, in Spanish a technical approach is more common. Aportar datos y cifras principales.
conclusionsPublications confirm and support biobanks' relevance in current and future biomedical research, but also illustrate the entanglement of a diverse range of healthcare institutions and relations. Biobanks' techno-scientific issues cannot be split from the ethical, legal, and social ones or place them as secondary; all of them are co-produced. This review points to current topics and challenges which need to be addressed to establish transparent, accountable, dynamic, and trust-worthy biobanks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32581211PMC11583044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.