Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32581209›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Effects of Marital Status on Prognosis in Women with Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: A Real-World 1: 1 Propensity-Matched Study.

Tian Lan, Yunyan Lu, Hua Luo, Junling He, Jiawei He, Zujian Hu, Haibin Xu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical implications of forkhead box M1, cyclooxygenase-2World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tian LanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Yunyan LuDepartment of Cardiology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Hua LuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Junling HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Jiawei HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Zujian HuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Haibin XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNThe First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The effects of marital status on infiltrating ductal carcinoma of breast cancer (IDC) have not been studied in detail. This study investigated the impact of marital status on IDC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS SEER databases were searched from 2010 to 2015 for subjects who were married, divorced, single, and widowed. The influence of marital status on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) of IDC patients was investigated through multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis. To prevent bias, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. RESULTS The 5-year OS was 89.6%in married patients, 84.9% in divorced patients, 83.5% in single patients, and 71.3% in widowed patients (p<0.001). The 5-year BCSS were 92.9%, 90.2%, 87.6%, and 86.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that marriage was a protective factor for patients with IDC in terms of OS (divorced: HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.21-1.32; p<0.001; single: HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.31-1.42; p<0.001; widowed: HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.36-1.48; p<0.001) and BCSS (divorced: HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.21; p<0.001; single: HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.21-1.33; p<0.001; widowed: HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.25-1.40; p<0.001). Following subgroup and PSM analysis, married patients were shown to have better OS and BCSS as opposed to divorced, single, or widowed patients. CONCLUSIONS We identify marital status as a predictor of survival in those with IDC. Widowed patients showed the highest mortality risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, DuctalCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMarital StatusMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsProtective Factors

Identifiers

PMID32581209
PMCPMC7333511
OpenAlexW3037741326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.