Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32581150›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2020

Biomarkers for chronic kidney disease in dogs: a comparison study.

Joonyoung Kim, Chang-Min Lee, Ha-Jung Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Supplementation withThe veterinary quarterly · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joonyoung KimDepartment of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 61186, Korea.
Chang-Min LeeDepartment of Veterinary Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Korea.
Ha-Jung KimDepartment of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 61186, Korea.
Chonnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and cystatin C (CysC) levels can be utilized as more accurate markers of early kidney dysfunction in dogs. Forty-one client-owned dogs with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which were clinically stable, and ten beagles as healthy controls were included. All dogs underwent physical examination, systemic blood pressure measurement, complete blood cell count, and plasma biochemistry analyses. Frozen serum was used for SDMA and CysC analyses. Data analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis, Pearson's correlation, Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic curve. SDMA and CysC levels were significantly higher in patients with CKD at various International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages than in the healthy controls. In particular, CysC level was the only biomarker that could indicate the earliest stage of CKD (IRIS stage I). Similar to these results, CysC level showed better sensitivity and specificity compared to the other biomarkers in early CKD dogs.

Indexed as

AnimalsArginineBiomarkersCystatin CDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMaleRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSensitivity and SpecificityArginineBiomarkersCystatin Csymmetric dimethylargininecaninecreatininecystatin Cglomerular filtration ratesymmetric dimethylarginine

Identifiers

PMID32581150
PMCPMC7468053
OpenAlexW3036509489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.