Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32581149›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2020

Metabolomic LC-MS/MS analyses and meta 16S rRNA gene analyses on cecal feces of Japanese rock ptarmigans reveal fundamental differences between semi-wild and captive raised individuals.

Atsushi Kobayashi, Sayaka Tsuchida, Takanari Hattori, Koretsugu Ogata, Atsushi Ueda, Takuji Yamada, Koichi Murata, Hiroshi Nakamura, Kazunari Ushida

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Two-year longitudinal study ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi KobayashiFaculty of Science, Toho University, Chiba 274-8510, Japan.
Sayaka TsuchidaGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto 606-8522, Japan.
Takanari HattoriShimadzu Corporation, Kyoto 604-8442, Japan.
Koretsugu OgataShimadzu Corporation, Kyoto 604-8442, Japan.
Atsushi UedaDepartment of Life Science and Technology, School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan.
Takuji YamadaShimadzu Corporation, Kyoto 604-8442, Japan.
Koichi MurataFaculty of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Kanagawa 252-0800, Japan.
Hiroshi NakamuraGeneral Foundation Hiroshi Nakamura International Institute for Ornithology, Nagano 380-0934, Japan.
Kazunari UshidaGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto 606-8522, Japan.
Shimadzu (Japan) · JPChubu University · JPKyoto Prefectural University · JPLife Science Institute · JPNakamura Toho Research Institute · JPNihon University · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ex situ conservation of Japanese rock ptarmigans began in 2015 with the aim of reintroducing artificially raised birds into their original habitat. However, the current raising method in captivity seems insufficient in terms of the survivability of artificially raised birds in natural conditions. Feeding management is one potential reason for such insufficiency. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the hydrophilic metabolites by LC-MS/MS for the cecal feces of Japanese rock ptarmigans under in situ and ex situ conservation to reveal their gut chemical environment. We also analyzed the developmental processes of cecal microbiomes both in situ semi-wild and ex situ captive individuals. Metabolites of nucleic acid were rich in the in situ individuals, and free amino acids were rich in the ex situ individuals. The differences in the microbiome composition between in situ and ex situ individuals were also pronounced; major genera of in situ individuals were not detected or few in ex situ individuals. The alpha diversity of the cecal microbiome of semi-wild chicks at 1 week of age was almost the same as that of their hens, while it was very low in captive individuals. Sub-therapeutic use of oxytetracycline, a diet rich in protein and energy, and isolation from adult birds are considered to be causes for these great differences in gut chemical and microbiological environment between in situ and ex situ individuals.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetabolomeAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacteriaCecumConservation of Natural ResourcesFecesFemaleMaleQuailRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sin situ and ex situ conservationmetabolomemicrobiomerock ptarmigans

Identifiers

PMID32581149
PMCPMC7468055
OpenAlexW3036283182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.