Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32581128›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Stable readout of observed actions from format-dependent activity of monkey's anterior intraparietal neurons.

Marco Lanzilotto, Monica Maranesi, Alessandro Livi, Carolina Giulia Ferroni, Guy A Orban, Luca Bonini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Population encoding of observed and actual somatosensations in the human posterior parietal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Representation of Observed Actions at the Subordinate, Basic, and Superordinate Level.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What Happened to Mirror Neurons?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco LanzilottoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy; marco.lanzilotto@unito.it luca.bonini@unipr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3854-7875
Monica MaranesiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Alessandro LiviDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Carolina Giulia FerroniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Guy A OrbanDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8179-9584
Luca BoniniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy; marco.lanzilotto@unito.it luca.bonini@unipr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3485-2127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans accurately identify observed actions despite large dynamic changes in their retinal images and a variety of visual presentation formats. A large network of brain regions in primates participates in the processing of others' actions, with the anterior intraparietal area (AIP) playing a major role in routing information about observed manipulative actions (OMAs) to the other nodes of the network. This study investigated whether the AIP also contributes to invariant coding of OMAs across different visual formats. We recorded AIP neuronal activity from two macaques while they observed videos portraying seven manipulative actions (drag, drop, grasp, push, roll, rotate, squeeze) in four visual formats. Each format resulted from the combination of two actor's body postures (standing, sitting) and two viewpoints (lateral, frontal). Out of 297 recorded units, 38% were OMA-selective in at least one format. Robust population code for viewpoint and actor's body posture emerged shortly after stimulus presentation, followed by OMA selectivity. Although we found no fully invariant OMA-selective neuron, we discovered a population code that allowed us to classify action exemplars irrespective of the visual format. This code depends on a multiplicative mixing of signals about OMA identity and visual format, particularly evidenced by a set of units maintaining a relatively stable OMA selectivity across formats despite considerable rescaling of their firing rate depending on the visual specificities of each format. These findings suggest that the AIP integrates format-dependent information and the visual features of others' actions, leading to a stable readout of observed manipulative action identity.

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMacacaMaleNeuronsParietal Lobeaction observationneural decodingparietal cortexvisual invariance

Identifiers

PMID32581128
PMCPMC7369316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.