Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580925›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

Olfactory and taste disorders in COVID-19: a systematic review.

Klinger V T da Costa, Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba, Katianne Wanderley Rocha, Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade, Sonia M S Ferreira, Pedro de L Menezes

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Prognosis of patients with coronavirus disease with or without anosmia: A systematic review.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Olfactory Dysfunction in Individuals with COVID-19 in Brazil: A Study of 20,669 Cases from 2020 to 2021.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 Patterns in Araraquara, Brazil: A Multimodal Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Post Viral Olfactory Dysfunction After SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Anticipated Post-pandemic Clinical Challenge.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Klinger V T da CostaUniversidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL), Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil. Electronic address: klingercostamcz@gmail.com.
Aline Tenório Lins CarnaúbaCentro Universitário Cesmac, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Katianne Wanderley RochaCentro Universitário Cesmac, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Kelly Cristina Lira de AndradeUniversidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas (UNCISAL), Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Sonia M S FerreiraCentro Universitário Cesmac, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Pedro de L MenezesUniversidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas (UNCISAL), Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Centro Universitário Cesmac · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe SARS-CoV-2 virus causes COVID-19, and it is responsible for the largest pandemic since the 1918 H1N1 influenza outbreak. The classic symptoms of the disease have been well defined by the World Health Organization; however, olfactory/gustatory disorders have been reported in some studies, but there are still several missing points in the understanding and in the consensus about the clinical management of these cases.

objectiveTo identify evidence in the scientific literature about olfactory/gustatory disorders, their clinical presentation, prevalence and possible specific treatments associated with COVID-19.

methodsA systematic review of articles published up to April 25, 2020 was performed in Medline, Cochrane Clinical Trials, ScienceDirect, Lilacs, Scopus and Google Schoolar, OpenGrey.eu, DissOnline, The New York Academy of Medicine and Reasearch Gate. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) Studies on patients with COVID-19; (2) Records of COVID-19 signs/symptoms, and olfactory/gustatory functions. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) Studies on non-human coronavirus; (2) Review articles; (3) Experimental studies (in animals or in vitro); (4) Olfactory/gustatory disorders initiated prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The risk assessment of bias of the selected studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

resultsSix articles from the 1788 records met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. A total of 1457 patients of different ethnicities were assessed; of them, 885 (60.7%) and 822 (56.4%) had smell and taste disorders, respectively, with women being most often affected. There were olfactory/gustatory disorders even without nasal obstruction/rhinorrhea and beginning even before the signs/symptoms of COVID-19; the recovery of smell/taste, when it occurs, usually happened in the first two weeks after COVID-19 resolution. There is evidence that olfactory/gustatory disorders are strong predictors of infection by SARS-CoV-2, and it is possible to recommend patient isolation, as early as of the medical consultation, preventing the spread of the virus. No scientific evidence has been identified for effective treatments for any of the disorders.

conclusionOlfactory/gustatory disorders may occur at varying intensities and prior to the general symptoms of COVID-19 and should be considered as part of the clinical features of COVID-19, even in mild cases. There is still no scientific evidence of specific treatments for such disorders in COVID-19 disease.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeOlfaction DisordersPandemicsPneumonia, ViralTaste DisordersBetacoronavirusCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleNutrition SurveysSARS-CoV-2SmellCOVID-19Distúrbios do olfatoDistúrbios do paladarDistúrbios olfativosOlfaction disordersOlfactory disordersSARS-CoV-2Taste disorders

Identifiers

PMID32580925
PMCPMC7280089
OpenAlexW3033376419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.