Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580799›Full record

ArticleDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2020

COVID-19 and Psychological Disaster Preparedness - An Unmet Need.

Vishwesh Agarwal, Supriya Sharma, Latika Gupta, Durga Prasanna Misra, Samira Davalbhakta, Vikas Agarwal, Ashish Goel, Shelley Aggarwal

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Reporting Survey Based Studies - a Primer for Authors.Journal of Korean medical science · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. COVID-19 and Psychological Disaster Preparedness - An Unmet Need - Corrigendum.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vishwesh AgarwalMahatma Gandhi Mission's Medical College, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-8354
Supriya SharmaSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Latika GuptaSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-2990
Durga Prasanna MisraSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Samira DavalbhaktaByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, India.
Vikas AgarwalSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Ashish GoelUniversity College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Shelley AggarwalStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a disaster of unprecedented proportions with global repercussions. Psychological preparedness, the primed cognitive awareness and anticipation of dealing with emotional responses in an adverse situation, has assumed a compelling relevance during a health disaster of this magnitude.

methodsAn anonymized eSurvey was conducted in India to assess psychological preparedness toward the ongoing pandemic with a focus on knowledge, management of own and others' emotional response, and anticipatory coping mechanisms among the survey population. An adapted version of the qualitative Psychological Preparedness for Natural Disaster Scale validated by the World Health Organization was widely circulated over the Internet and various social media platforms for assessment. Results are expressed as median ± standard deviation. Descriptive statistics were used and figures downloaded from surveymonkey.com.

resultsOf the 1120 respondents (M:F 1.7:1, age 35 years ±14.1), most expressed a high level of perceived knowledge and confidence of managing COVID-19, such as awareness of the symptoms of the illness (95.1%), actions needed (94.4%), hospital to report to (88.9%), and emergency contact number (89.1%). A majority (95%) monitored regularly the news bulletins and scientific journals regarding COVID-19. However, nearly one-third (29.2%) could not assess their likelihood of developing COVID-19, and 17.5% were unaware of the difference between a mild and severe infection. Twenty-three percent (23.3%) were unfamiliar with the materials needed in an acute illness situation.

conclusionPsychological disaster preparedness is reasonable, although lacking in specific domains. Timely but focused interventions can be a cost-efficient administrative exercise, which federal agencies may prioritize working on.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHealth LiteracyHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairesawarenessepidemicknowledgepsychological preparednesspsychologyrisk

Identifiers

PMID32580799
PMCPMC7385318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.